Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor; Cboldt

“That is why they coined a new term, ‘native citizen,’ rather than using an existing term that they recognized to have a decidedly different meaning.”

Hmmm:

““As the President is required to be a native citizen of the United States…. Natives are all persons born within the jurisdiction and allegiance of the United States.”

James Kent, COMMENTARIES ON AMERICAN LAW (1826)

Yet you say WKA coined a “new term”?

The terms have been used interchangeably for years. Remember, Vattel never wrote “natural born citizen”. He wrote about natives, or indigenous. It wasn’t until 10 years AFTER the Constitution was written that a translation was made of Vattel using NBC.


289 posted on 09/20/2011 5:58:01 PM PDT by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers

I appreciate that you were considerate enough to include me in your response. But really, there is no need. As I said, I have no intention of again debating substance with you. We had our respective says to each other some months ago, left on good terms, and I consider the matter between us to be completely concluded.


293 posted on 09/20/2011 6:03:28 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson