[Squeeky]

The state case isn’t contrary to anything except the legal theories of the Vattle Birthers. The state case is based on Won Kim Ark which is a Federal Case. Because the Vattle Birthers can’t find any case at all that says it takes two citizen parents to make a natural born citizen, and if there aren’t two citizen parents then the person is not a natural born citizen. Sooo, why don’t you admit that you can’t find any case that says that???

[AmericanVictory]

Wrong on all counts. It is directly contrary to all federal authority on point, including Wong Kim Ark, which, of course, did not even treat of Article II's eligibility requirement which is evident from that case. When carefully read, the case does not say what the state court held and, in fact, precludes the state court's conclusion. Your complete ignorance is quite touching and revealing. Do you really think that your opinion outweighss that of John Marshall or that the common law was governing on the point contrary to the controlling authority of Story's decision in Shanks v. Dupont that it was not? Somehow I don't think so. And then there is the authority of both Tucker and Ramsay, who were the leading authorities of the day on point. It does take a bit to actually learn to read law and correctly comprehend and interpret it. Calling people who are informed names does not quite cut it. All it does is reveal that you have not the slightest idea of what you are talking about and thus resort to the name calling.