Why do you continue to post things that you are seemingly unable to understand?
The difference between personal opinions and established principles constantly escapes you.
Blackstone’s are in no way reflective, nor effective upon US law. There is another commentary that was in greater acceptance at that time; why did you not quote therefrom?
Because you chose the abberant commentary that supports your abberant political philosophy.
YOU WROTE:
“Over 160 years of American eighth grade students being taught that Natural Born meant that both of your parents had to be citizens should be a good place to start.
No other idea even existed until the last decade.”
So I provided you multiple quotes, including legal cases, going back as far as 1795.
“Because you chose the abberant [sic] commentary that supports your abberant political philosophy.”
Aberrant?
“1. departing from the right, normal, or usual course.
2. deviating from the ordinary, usual, or normal type; exceptional; abnormal.”
Hmmm...my legal interpretation is backed by 200+ years of quotes, and every state, every court and every congressman. Yours is endorsed by WorldNutDaily.
Which of us is “aberrant”?