Believe it or not, the Obummer Birth issue isn't a Conservative tenant. I can cite countless Conservatives that find this a non issue. Do you find Mark Steyn, Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh phoney Conservative?
The Birthers shot the wad on this and came up losers. Corsi promised to have the smoking gun. His book was an absolute dud. Countless lawsuits and investigations yielded nothing. Now the few people on this are circling the wagons, to save face with people like Orly Taitz. She is a professional tin hat wearing nut. Look into her other conspiracy theories if you would like to see what that crowd looks like.
A lot of good will and faith was put into this concept of Obummers eligibility. That time and effort could have been better served investigating all the real corruption this Regime has been involved in while everyone was distracted with this. Just look at all the things like Gunwalker and Solyndra that have come to the surface since the BC issue went dead. To still be debating eligibility is ridiculous at this point.
FAIL!
Well, you have to make a distinction between Common Sense Suspicious Birthers and the Vattle Birthers. Because we are like the Michael Caine person in the movie Dirty Rotten Scoundrels, and the Vattle Birthers are like the Steve Martin “Prince Rupreck” person. LOL!!!
I can understand people not being interested, avoiding threads that bore them or they think a waste of time.
What I do not understand is posting on threads one considers boring or a waste of time and telling people concerned about Constitutional issues that they are “kooks”.
No, I don’t undestand that at all.
I also don’t understand why any actual conservative thinks it doesn’t matter that a president may very likely be fraudulent and ineligible, although I can see why conservatives might think other issues are more worth their time. But I cannot understand why a conservative who thinks other issues are more important would then spend his precious minutes on threads/topics he thinks are a waste of time...
To still be debating eligibility is ridiculous at this point.
And yet here you are. You both prove and disprove your own point.