Oh, I know that I am not a lawyer, and that is why I rely on what the law case thingies say. Like:
“Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”
I did have a minor in English, sooo I bet that sentence says Obama is legal if he was truly born in Hawaii (or Connecticut). But, just to be sure, I also asked my mother’s lawyer and paid him $50 last year. Plus, my BFF Fabia Sheen, Esq.
So yes. I am pretty confident.
And utterly ignorant to rely upon a state court case that is contrary ot the legal authority I have referred to and which mistates what Wong Kim Ark says and which was not written by anyone with any knowledge of the Framers and what they meant.
And utterly ignorant to rely upon a state court case that is contrary ot the legal authority I have referred to and which mistates what Wong Kim Ark says and which was not written by anyone with any knowledge of the Framers and what they meant.