Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop; Squeeky
What would such a understanding do to the unity of the United States, its culture, and its national security?

Seems to me that three Presidents without any concern about bloodlines from anyone - FDR, Johnson and Clinton - more than divided this nation. Not just culturally but socially, economically, and politically.

Some of the most rabid, pro-American unity folks I know are naturalized citizens. And some of the most anti-American, tear-it-all-down types are Americans by birth.

What groups take English/American names for themselves, insist their kids learn our History and language? Typically immigrants from Asia. What groups make up names to sound foreign or insist on names from back in their home country, and ignore what their kids learn about our history and language? Sad to say - a lot of Mexican aliens and a good chunk of our own blacks.

I'd take a Jindal or Rubio any day as President over what we have now, or someone like Waxman, or Rangel. Jindal and Rubio are so much more American to the core...

163 posted on 09/20/2011 1:38:16 PM PDT by FromTheSidelines ("everything that deceives, also enchants" - Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: FromTheSidelines
I'd take a Jindal or Rubio any day as President over what we have now, or someone like Waxman, or Rangel. Jindal and Rubio are so much more American to the core..
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Great! Since you feel strongly about this, join with others and lobby for a Constitutional Amendment that would allow a Jindal or Rubio to be president.

167 posted on 09/20/2011 1:51:46 PM PDT by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

To: FromTheSidelines
I'd take a Jindal or Rubio any day as President over what we have now, or someone like Waxman, or Rangel. Jindal and Rubio are so much more American to the core...

The founders merely set forth a standard that within their understanding could be regarded as a reasonable bar to foreign influence in American government. That they could not foresee the absolute mess that would occur years later was not their fault.

In any case, in accordance with constitutional principles, a law stands until it is repealed. It may be a technicality, but I wouldn't give Obama the slightest break on a technicality. He used technicalities to win his first two elections to office. (And I think the third as well.)

But I understand your point. Rubio would make a far better and loyal president then the idiot we have now.

224 posted on 09/20/2011 4:27:30 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson