You are making excuses for behavior that by all rights should be inexcusable. Obviously you have an interest here other than trying to find out the truth of the matter that you’re not disclosing.
I’ve not time for folks that are constantly reading agenda’s into every post that disagrees with theirs. It shows a lack of creativity and a base weakness in your own argument. And it is soooooooo boring to boot.
The EO was a bad decision. Period. MB’s attack was over the top and not in proportion. Period. Only folks whose agenda is to push MB for the nomination or to defeat Perry for the nomination would have a problem with that synopsis. Perry has been an executive for ten years. Only Romney and to some extent, Cain, have anywhere near that kind of executive record - meaning that those with executive experience are going to have more decisions in their past and thus, more mistakes in their past than those with zERO executive experience.
If we are not mature enough to look at the totality of a ten year record, then we are in deep trouble. Perry has an over all good record on parental rights and a checkered record on cronyism.
He uses state government a bit too agressively, but he has been consistent on rolling back the Fed’s power for a long time. Running for President, I am more interested in his long term view of the Fed Govt’ than necessarily his micro managing of the governorship. All are fair game, but keep our eye on the ball here folks.