Posted on 09/15/2011 7:28:37 AM PDT by radioone
WASHINGTON (September 9) – Congressman Spencer Bachus (AL-6) today said he is outraged by an “indefensible” regulation that could require the demolition of storm shelters built to protect school children in Alabama after the deadly tornadoes of April 27.
In a letter to President Obama, Bachus said that he will introduce legislation to prohibit the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) from tearing down storm shelters that were constructed to accompany portable classrooms. In the meantime, Congressman Bachus is asking the President to direct FEMA to suspend a policy that one school administrator has flatly stated “stinks.”
“It makes no sense to demolish perfectly good storm shelters just to satisfy a misguided bureaucratic requirement. School administrators who find themselves caught in a classic government Catch-22 are rightly upset, because the safety of our children and citizens should always be the foremost concern. If it takes legislation to set this right, that’s what we will do,” said Bachus, who is Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee.
Under current FEMA policy, storm shelters built with FEMA funds to serve portable classrooms must be torn down once damaged schools have been repaired or replaced. While the structures can be purchased from FEMA at “fair market” rates, the cost is prohibitive for school systems already dealing with storm-related expenses. The added insult, said Bachus, is that the shelters would then be torn down using more taxpayer funds.
“To use the words of one school official, to tear a shelter down when it could be used by a community, something is just not right about that. In fact, it’s downright crazy. Building more storm shelters has been a priority for the State of Alabama since the tornadoes. We can’t afford to lose any that we have now,” Bachus said.
To view Congressman Bachus' letter to the President, click here. http://financialservices.house.gov/UploadedFiles/9-7-11_STB_ltr_to_Obama_-_FEMA_storm_shelters.pdf
The bigger government and bureaucracy get, the more idiotic they become. FEMA can use some trimming down.
I had one such vehicle which I tried to trade in at the time, but every car which interested us was at least inflated by the $4000 or so which the artificial trade-in value would have gotten us.
Gee, what a coincidence, I thought!
But it did have the effect of pricing those cars higher. The spring after the program ended, I got nearly that by selling the vehicle on Craig's List. The buyer still didn't get a bad deal-- he could see my car was a lot better maintained than the average car of that vintage.
..I want this person to be named, and to offer the criteria to make such a rule....why?...when?...and what for/...
....maybe he/she could convince the rest of us that he/she is really not as stupid as this makes he/she look.....
....maybe??...
Perhaps this policy of enabling the construction of shelters for temporary classrooms came as part of a waiver of the Davis-Bacon Act. Davis-Bacon mandates that governments pay the going rate for construction, and that has been taken (I believe by statutory amendment, but I’m not sure of that) to require union rates.
This policy would force schools to knock down the shelters, and in order to rebuild them they would have to pay the going union rate for their re-construction.
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.