I’m leaning toward Perry at the moment after Palin was my go-to candidate until recently, but this dissection of her remarks is as vague as the speech it is criticizing.
I don’t care about sites that are sympathetic to a candidate—who needs cheerleading? I want to see EVERY candidate’s positions dissected. But this was a statement of intent, and if it was filled with details, this writer would be complaining about how boring and “insider” it was.
She spoke in simple ideas, but they’re GOOD ideas.
The article in question is written by a site that has its mnd made up already for RINO Romney.
And the writer of this article seems to miss the obvious—Palin said “it’s not enough” to speak in generalities. She didn’t say “you should never” speak in generalities.
The most important point is that “It requires deeds, not words.” It’s like the guy didn’t read the very beginning of his own article.
I agree with you, see my post #74. :)