Are we supposed to believe she’s delivering a veiled attack on Governor Perry?
Of Governor Perry, she wrote in her 2009 endorsement letter:
“He walks the walk of a true conservative”.
Palin in the fray | The Economist
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2009/02/palin_2012_ladies_against_wome
And not only did she not mention crony capitalism in her endorsement, she has not mentioned it since Governor Perry announced his candidacy, in referencing him. I’m sure she has in referencing Obama.
Where has she been on this, if we are supposed to believe she was aiming this at Governor Perry?
I guess, if she was, suddenly it isn’t good enough that she thinks Rick Perry “walks the walk of a true conservative”.
Well, how can that not be good enough? Could she be saying he’s a conservative, but he’s also a crook? And I’m just now bringing that up after all this time because...oh, never mind.
It’s all so confusing...
I think she has always been opposed to crony capitalism, her position is consistent on the matter. People just draw a connection to Rick Perry and make the assumption that her comments are directed towards him due to the fact that the accussation appears to be an appropriate one for him.
Sarah Palin never said Rick Perry was honest and wouldn’t give “special consideration” to contributors.
You fell into the trap. The media implies she meant Perry. Can’t this primary arguement be about something more than personal attacks formented by the media? Say something like the issues, or even worse, solutions?
The only person she mentioned by name was the ultimate opposition but she did isolate herself from a past commitment with the Hobbit reference. She put everyone on notice that her debt was paid in full.