So, Judge Dummy, wanna explain to me how a Hawaiin born person gets a Connecticut ss #?
How exactly does that happen. Step by step.
Go...
Is this for real? Where is the proof? Just asking, not trying to refute. Where does this come from?
Where are Uncle Omar's numbers from?
This is the troubling question. Lamberth didn't conclude that probable fraud by Obama in obtaining his SSN would provide “insight into the SSA’s operations.” Wouldn't failure to detect and prevent fraudulent SSN applications provide “insight” into failed internal controls at SSA?
To protect Obama’s privacy rights, Lamberth appears to have required proof of fraud from Orly, not just speculation from her that Obama’s SSN was probably obtained by fraud. In that sense, his ruling was “conservative” and narrow.
Remember that Astrue was the defendant, not Obama. Orly had to provide convincing evidence that SSA screwed up, not Obama.
As long as it is possible for a person born in HI to have an CT SSN (it is), then SSA is in the clear for Judge Lamberth. Orly is not entitled to a "fishing expedition" even if that would likely to produce evidence of fraud. Likely isn't good enough for Lamberth.
Per Lamberth’s ruling:
“The disclosure of an individual’s Form SS-5 would provide absolutely no insight into the SSA’s operations or activities. And plaintiff—for all her allegations—has produced no“evidence that would warrant a belief by a reasonable person that the alleged government impropriety might have occurred.” Nat’l Archives and Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157,174 (2004). Her vehement allegations of fraud consist of mere “bare suspicion[s]” and thus fail to satisfy the public interest standard required under FOIA.”