Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Lamberth Grants Defendant's Summary Judgement Killing Obama Social Security Number Case
BirtherReport.com ^ | August 30, 2011 | Unattributed

Posted on 08/30/2011 1:04:27 PM PDT by Seizethecarp

Taitz v Astrue

ORDER

Upon consideration of defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [21], plaintiff’s opposition [31], the reply thereto [32], the entire record herein, and the applicable law, and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s Memorandum Opinion issued this date, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [21] is GRANTED.

Final judgment is hereby entered for defendant, dismissing this case with prejudice. SO ORDERED.

Signed by Royce C. Lamberth, Chief Judge, on August 30, 2011.

(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: naturalborncitizen; obama; orlytaitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: TheBattman
Orly may be a bit wacky - but what makes that grounds for summary dismissal with prejudice?

Bit wacky. Right. A nice euphemism for incompetent. What has she ever succeeded in, in all her legal work? Nothing. This might be a trend.
21 posted on 08/30/2011 1:52:27 PM PDT by Cheburashka (If found, please return this Ring of Power to Sauron, Lord of Darkness. Return postage guaranteed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Is this for real? Where is the proof? Just asking, not trying to refute. Where does this come from?


22 posted on 08/30/2011 1:56:21 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: chris37
"So, Judge Dummy, wanna explain to me how a Hawaiin born person gets a Connecticut ss #?

Where are Uncle Omar's numbers from?

23 posted on 08/30/2011 2:00:28 PM PDT by cookcounty ("I love loving him," --brilliant Matha's Vinyud liberal explaining her support for Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
Of course, President Obama could quickly voluntarily release a copy of his original Social Security application tomorrow that he supposedly filled out in the 1970s, form SS-5, but he won't.

If President Obama does not want the world to see his entire number----although the entire number can be fould on his Selective Service application form that he signed in 1980---he could leave only the first 3 digits visible and black out the rest of the numbers, the last 6 numbers.

He then could voluntarily release a copy of his SS application that he supposedly filled out in Hawaii when he was a teenager in Hawaii in the 1970s, but he won't.

Why not? Because he knows, just as we know, that a Barack Obama SS application either does not exist, or there is some information on the application that would be politically damaging to Obama, for instance, it could show a Connecticut address, an address that can be used to find out who filled out the SS application in Connecticut.

24 posted on 08/30/2011 2:08:20 PM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheburashka

“Bit wacky. Right. A nice euphemism for incompetent. What has she ever succeeded in, in all her legal work? Nothing. This might be a trend.”

Yet she seems to be the only person to actually get any
of these cases to court only to be thrown out with
“prejudice”. Is she being used to scare off anyone else’s
attempt or is she in on it?


25 posted on 08/30/2011 2:11:04 PM PDT by Slambat (The right to keep and bear arms. Anything one man can carry, drive or pull.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

Is what for real?

Yes, Hawaiian “born” Obama has a Connecticut SS #.

It comes from Orly Tiatz, birther lawyer who most describe as nuts, but I agree with her. No doubt Obama is a fraud and he is not who he says he is by any means.

But it doesn’t matter a hill of beans, no one’s gonna toss our first black president cause he isn’t eligible and cause he faked his identity.

We, the people, voted him in, and it’s gonna be We, the people, who vote him out, and that is all there is to it.


26 posted on 08/30/2011 2:13:09 PM PDT by chris37 (representative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

27 posted on 08/30/2011 2:15:56 PM PDT by starlifter (Pullum sapit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
"Ever persistent, the plaintiff has once again come before this Court in an effort to uncover 'the biggest coverup in the history of this nation'...As her numerous filings with the Court will demonstrate, plaintiff will stop at nothing to get to the bottom of this alleged conspiracy. Unfortunately for the plaintiff, today is not her lucky day."

Who says judicial rulings can't be humorous?

28 posted on 08/30/2011 2:26:29 PM PDT by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
I’m sure the treasonous OBots are celebrating this BS as they were sweating it at times.

An opportunity to read the latest judicial ruling on Orly's latest antics is always cause for celebration.

29 posted on 08/30/2011 2:41:16 PM PDT by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo

Get lost troll.


30 posted on 08/30/2011 2:42:30 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Get lost troll.

Having a bad day, are we?

31 posted on 08/30/2011 2:44:42 PM PDT by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo

Not really troll.

So what FogBLow are you?


32 posted on 08/30/2011 2:46:15 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: chris37
“So, Judge Dummy, wanna explain to me how a Hawaiin born person gets a Connecticut ss #?”

This is the troubling question. Lamberth didn't conclude that probable fraud by Obama in obtaining his SSN would provide “insight into the SSA’s operations.” Wouldn't failure to detect and prevent fraudulent SSN applications provide “insight” into failed internal controls at SSA?

To protect Obama’s privacy rights, Lamberth appears to have required proof of fraud from Orly, not just speculation from her that Obama’s SSN was probably obtained by fraud. In that sense, his ruling was “conservative” and narrow.

Remember that Astrue was the defendant, not Obama. Orly had to provide convincing evidence that SSA screwed up, not Obama.

As long as it is possible for a person born in HI to have an CT SSN (it is), then SSA is in the clear for Judge Lamberth. Orly is not entitled to a "fishing expedition" even if that would likely to produce evidence of fraud. Likely isn't good enough for Lamberth.

Per Lamberth’s ruling:

“The disclosure of an individual’s Form SS-5 would provide absolutely no insight into the SSA’s operations or activities. And plaintiff—for all her allegations—has produced no“evidence that would warrant a belief by a reasonable person that the alleged government impropriety might have occurred.” Nat’l Archives and Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157,174 (2004). Her vehement allegations of fraud consist of mere “bare suspicion[s]” and thus fail to satisfy the public interest standard required under FOIA.”

33 posted on 08/30/2011 3:04:05 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Guilty as sin, free as a bird; what a great country!


34 posted on 08/30/2011 3:06:42 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Obama is the least qualified guy in whatever room he walks into.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Is Orly feenished?


35 posted on 08/30/2011 3:08:56 PM PDT by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kleon

“Is Orly feenished?”

Her HI subpoena is finished, but Orly is _never_ finished (so far). Orly is the energizer bunny!

Orly anticipated that Lamberth would deep-six her Astrue case so she introduced numerous other claims in HI courts as a backstop, IIRC.


36 posted on 08/30/2011 3:22:35 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Well, I accept that in terms of this case, but I would like a detailed, step by step explanation of the process that resulted in his having a Connecticut SS#.

I mean, I certainly don’t believe that a man who lies 100 % of the time is telling the truth about his identity, nope, I really don’t.

But that being said, I have no expectation that any explanation will occur, and quite frankly, it doesn’t matter to my overall philosophy on this, because we are the ones who ignorantly voted his fraudulent ass in, and it will be we who vote his fraudulent ass out.

(Not that I actually voted for him, just speaking collectively as a citizen. This is our duty, not the duty of some judge).


37 posted on 08/30/2011 3:23:03 PM PDT by chris37 (representative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

“She believes that the President is using a “fraudulently obtained” social security number and that the Social Security Administration—among other agencies—is involved in a scheme to “cover[] up social security fraud, IRS fraud, elections fraud and possibly treason” committed by the President.”

Why yes, Judge Lambert that’s about as silly and far-fetched as the ATF, DOJ and other government law enforcement entities illegally running guns to Mexico resulting in the murder of an American border agent among others. That would never happen.

That would be as silly and far-fetched as the President having illegal alien relatives with numerous fake SSN’s. That would never happen.


38 posted on 08/30/2011 3:54:21 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Taitz can keep the ball rolling if she appeals.

If the only reason is to keep the issue alive and in front of the complicit OBots and their liberal media. To remind everyone including them that they are a bunch of scofflaws.

And new derogatory or hard information against Obama could surface to be used in any appeal.


39 posted on 08/30/2011 4:09:50 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jeffo

Obama believes that children who survive botched abortions should be left without medical attention to die of dehydration and/or starvation. do you really think that he cares whether or not adults who are seeking info that could bring down his corrupt regime die in the process of voluntarily doing so? The only way to bring down this Marxist purveyor of the culture of death is with a Congressional investigation and removal proceeding, (unlikely since they are exhibiting their supine cowardice in this regard) an election, or by force of arms.


40 posted on 08/30/2011 6:44:22 PM PDT by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson