Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: TheWriterTX

Thanks for the information. I know we have to plan to spend no more than we plan to take in, but didn’t know about the limits on total debt. In addition, the Texas Regional Transportation Mobility boards and the ability to issue bonds was part of the Constitutional amendments in 2001.


54 posted on 08/28/2011 7:24:23 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://WingRight.org (I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.) (RIAing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: hocndoc
There are states ~ e.g. California and Illinois ~ who regularly issue bonds to cover state operating expenses. Other states sell bonds to finance specific projects. Yet other states isolate specific projects and levy a tax on the beneficiaries.

There are a great number of legal schemes that've been developed over the years to both enable the sale of bonds and also to isolate the government from having to pay those bonds if something goes wrong.

The Barrett law (mentioned earlier) is about the most restrictive method. It's used in Indiana, and in Germany and Denmark under a different name. Some of the former Eastbloc states may have also revived it.

The USPs debt is restricted to USPS activities ~ and works pretty much as a mortgage against buildings and equipment. It's close to the second most restrictive system.

Most other systems are a combination of general revenue bonds, mortgages, and special user fees (in this country).

Politicians have developed an immense repetoire of BS to flim-flam the public about the nature of the public debt.

60 posted on 08/28/2011 8:28:19 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson