Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Scott
This is not how you defend a candidate.

Is that what I was trying to do?

Further, I need not explain myself to anyone. Not even you.

I checked the list this morning.

You're not on it.

Go look stuff up.

89 posted on 08/20/2011 1:05:53 PM PDT by humblegunner (The kinder, gentler version...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: humblegunner
Is that what I was trying to do?

In effect, yes.

Further, I need not explain myself to anyone. Not even you.

I checked the list this morning.

You're not on it.

Go look stuff up.

I sought a cogent rebuttal to the issues raised in BC's piece. Instead, you respond with juvenile one-liners and supercilious assertations with commands to 'look stuff up'. Apparently you have no real argument against the contentions raised by Brice, but just enjoy posting snarky replies to anyone who questions your abrupt dismissal of issues that, for conservatives, reflect poorly on Texas Governor Rick Perry. O.K. I had once thought Rick Perry might be my fall-back candidate if Sarah Palin declined to run but at this point, I'm beginning to think not. Perry is going to be vetted, one way or another, whether his supporters like it or not. That cannot and should not be avoided. If the only response to negative assertions about Perry's record from his supporters are arrogant brush-offs, devoid of facts but with lots of attitude, he won't survive the vetting. So be it.

115 posted on 08/20/2011 1:37:56 PM PDT by Jim Scott ( "Game On!" - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson