Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Fantasywriter
Arthur’s father naturalized and became a citizen, and Arthur lied his butt off about the date when that occurred. Also he purposefully gave out misleading hints as to where he was born to take the heat off questions about his father’s naturalization date.

Now get you stories straight Birthers. No body doubted Arthur could be President if he was born in the United States, to a British Subject. The controversy surrounded his date of birth, and his lack of proof that date. If Arthur was just a bit older than he claimed, he was born in Canada, and not an American citizen at all.

But hey, I understand how being accurate and truthful limits your arguments when you are a Birther.

154 posted on 08/19/2011 11:43:14 AM PDT by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: Pilsner

The controversy was over the date at which Arthur’s father was naturalized. Arthur lied like a rug about it, and that i a fact.

Listen, Pilsner, here’s what you’re arguing. That “natural born citizen” means half Kenyan. That is a Soros argument. You keep making it, though. It plays right into the destruction of the US that our half-Kenyan president is wreaking. He thinks like a Kenyan, talks like a Kenyan and acts like a Kenyan. That is why he is hellbent on “fundamentally changing” the US. You are propping him up by arguing that ‘half-Kenyan’ = ‘natural born US citizen’. You have a very twisted view on what it means to be a natural born American. I don’t share it.


157 posted on 08/19/2011 11:51:33 AM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson