Again,
"... it is the main tenet of the Einstein theory that any two ways of looking at the world which are related to each other by a coordinate transformation are entirely equivalent from a physical point of view.... "
Hoyle, Fred. Nicolaus Copernicus. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd., 1973.
"So the Earth going around the Sun, does that only exist in peoples minds?"
Again,
"What I want to bring into the open is the fact that we are using philosophical criteria in choosing our models. A lot of cosmology tries to hide that.
Ellis, George, in Scientific American, Thinking Globally, Acting Universally, October 1995
What philosophical criteria did you use in “choosing our models” - which of these ‘equivalent’ models do you think accurately reflects reality?
The Earth goes around the Sun.
The Sun goes around the Earth.
Which one?
Cut and paste again because you are too embarrassed to say?
I would be also.
It is embarrassing!
“There is no scientific evidence favoring geokineticism over geocentrism. Thats the point of their quotes. You, however, put the word of men over the Word of God, period.”
GourmetDan
So why the resistance towards telling me what “the Word of God” is on this subject? Obviously because I reject geocentrism I “put the word of men over the Word of God”. Logically (if you are capable) that would mean you think geocentrism is “the Word of God”.
So why try to claim you think the two systems are equivalent and refuse to answer a simple question about a scientific model and its intersection with “the Word of God”?