Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Matchett-PI; betty boop; Mind-numbed Robot; Alamo-Girl; LeGrande; exDemMom; xzins; metmom; ...
Back when I was a newly minted Christian, on arrival back in the USA an agnostic friend attempted to dissuade me of my newfound faith. He asked the question, "do you think "God" would actually create things with an appearance of age? What would be his intent...was he trying to stump us all?"

Roughly 2-3 years a Christian at that point, the answer to the first question came pretty quickly, "Yes, He would create with an appearance of age." I can only say that the notion of soil passed before my eyes, and it seemed to me that soil is the result of a long process, but it is also necessary for plants to grow.

To the second question, "Was He trying to stump us?" I replied, "No." I had no insight at the time, I just didn't think God's intent was to fool everyone.

Since then, I've come to believe that God does sometimes set up conditions that permit foolish people to fool themselves (see the story of Micaiah and Ahab), but I would still say, "No." I've viewed it more like my setting up a sealed terrarium with the proper balance of plants and animals to establish a self-sustaining system.

Am I to question God on how He established the earth? (God to Job: who are you to question me on the foundation of the earth?)

Creating tools to enable tools to enable life.

The appearance of age.

477 posted on 08/31/2011 6:12:01 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies ]


To: xzins; Matchett-PI; betty boop; Mind-numbed Robot; Alamo-Girl; LeGrande; exDemMom; GodGunsGuts; ...

God created Adam as a MAN and Eve as a WOMAN.

That implies full grown, fully functioning, with the appearance of age.

It wasn’t for the purposes of deception, as the God haters would like to imply, but practical functionality.

Science would date man as being say, 30 years old (for the sake of argument) on the day he was created as a full grown man.

The believer would say that man was one day old.

The *scientist* would mock the believer for being so stupid as to believe that instead of what the evidence presented, the appearance of age.

Who would be right?


478 posted on 08/31/2011 6:22:26 AM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson