Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC; Mind-numbed Robot; metmom
Ah so you can enter a mind and determine what is or is not imagination? Is it possible that "everything" in a mind is nothing but imagination? Or how does a figment in one mind become a figment in another mind?

What are you blabbering about? They claimed that their 'GOD' had no attributes. Who am I to disagree?

383 posted on 08/27/2011 7:22:37 PM PDT by LeGrande ("life's tough; it's tougher if you're stupid." John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies ]


To: LeGrande
What are you blabbering about? They claimed that their 'GOD' had no attributes. Who am I to disagree?

It looks like I'm blabbering about your blabber.

385 posted on 08/27/2011 7:29:42 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies ]

To: LeGrande; metmom; AndrewC; betty boop
They claimed that their 'GOD' had no attributes. Who am I to disagree?

Wrong again! If you weren't being such a jerk I would let you off as having a faulty memory but your frequent logical slights of hand and linguistic tap dancing requires me to know you are simply lying to evade blame.

We said our God contains ALL attributes as He created the whole thing and still resides in and supervises every aspect of it. You told be to name an attribute and you would falsify it. When I said He was all attributes you responded that my God was full of crap since that is an attribute, another of your purposeful misdirections, and I said that was not an attribute of God since He is above all that but He did create a world in which you could be full of crap. Perhaps that will refresh your memory.

You also use the term that you will "falsify" a point of view, i.e. Au contraire. My God is all attributes so just pick one and disprove it.

How funny : ) So your GOD is full of crap (an attribute) I don't see him crapping in my toilet (he would have to be crapping eternally in all toilets) Therefore I have falsified your concept of GOD.

Is it really possible to prove a negative? If so, then you will be the first to accomplish it. If not why are you insistent on it?

No, that is why I asked for a definition of God. I can falsify that. If you say that GoD is undefinable I say fine it is a meaningless tautology then, which is just as good as a falsification.

I assume that is another of your tricks in that falsifying something is not the same as proving it false. In fact, the dictionary defines falsifying as

1 alter (information or evidence) so as to mislead.

1 forge, fake, counterfeit, fabricate; alter, change, doctor, tamper with, fudge, manipulate, adulterate, corrupt, misrepresent, misreport, distort, warp, embellish, embroider; cook.

That is exactly what you have been doing!

I am tired of playing your game, LeGrande, and if I didn't enjoy visiting with the intelligent people here I would have left long ago.

392 posted on 08/27/2011 9:01:02 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (I retain the right to be inconsistent, contradictory and even flat-out wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson