And, more importantly (IMHO), mom, can Natural Law cite impeccable scientific authorities in support of his Scientific views, and can he confine his Scientific views to matters Scientific, and not meander off into matters of philosophy, of religion, of education, of public policy, or of politics generally?
Probably not.
I’m certainly not going to hold my breath waiting to find out.
Now that depends on who gets to judge credentials doesn't it. If seen these little games played on these forums long enough that I'm not taking your bait. Whatever source I cite, professors, Nobel laureates, published and peer reviewed papers, heck even the burning bush, will be ridiculed.
Meanwhile, complete crap from creationist websites and unattributed wikipedia article will be cited as authoritative. As long as you have access to Google you will always find an "expert" who agrees with you.
Is this impeccable enough for you:
"I love science. Just like evolution, it’s one of God’s greatest creations. It’s the gift that keeps on giving." - Jim Robinson