Replies

Silly cow, The Military has always had veto power over presidential elections.

So you finally showed your fascist colors. Good to see you being honest for a change.

An original document is not absurdly high

The duplicity of birthers never ceases to amaze me.

You know damn well you wouldn't be satisfied with an original birth certificate even if Hawaii's public health director delivered it to you in person and swore under oath to its authenticity. You have stated to me numerous times how you don't trust Hawaii's birth registration procedures, and how you believe it is likely that Obama's official documents say he was born in Hawaii when he wasn't.

And then even if you could be satisfied that he was born in Hawaii, you still would say he is ineligible because his father wasn't a US citizen.

So don't give me this crap about how all it would take is just a $12 document. That's a lie and you know it.

So you finally showed your fascist colors. Good to see you being honest for a change.

Pointing out the obvious is not fascist, it's realist. All Militarys throughout history hold veto power over whatever occurs. That they chose not to use it does not mean they do not have it.

The duplicity of birthers never ceases to amaze me.

I suspect you are amazed by all sorts of ideas you make up. You obviously live in a childlike wonder state, and the wonder is that you think you're mature enough to debate with anyone.

You know damn well you wouldn't be satisfied with an original birth certificate even if Hawaii's public health director delivered it to you in person and swore under oath to its authenticity.

See, there you go again, telling me of knowledge you do not have. You also overlook the fact that the Hawaiian director cannot swear to something of which they have no personal knowledge. They can only swear that they are presenting a copy of what is in their files. (And they won't do that) As they keep obfuscating, their credibility degrades by the day. When one is cooperating in telling the truth, they get it out quickly and without delay.

Had they produced a clear copy of his long form, and certified it as a "true and correct copy of the original record" EVERYONE would have accepted it. Because they keep pulling stunts, nobody trusts them to tell the truth anymore.

You have stated to me numerous times how you don't trust Hawaii's birth registration procedures, and how you believe it is likely that Obama's official documents say he was born in Hawaii when he wasn't.

This only proves you don't listen or that you don't comprehend. I said it is one possibility of two. I have said that everything which has been shown so far may in fact be the truth, but because they haven't been forthright, they are no longer trustworthy in my mind.

And then even if you could be satisfied that he was born in Hawaii, you still would say he is ineligible because his father wasn't a US citizen.

You are just full of assumptions. Wouldn't his eligibility depend upon what is on his REAL birth certificate? If his REAL birth certificate says his father is Frank Davis, then he is absolutely eligible. I am not presuming what we shall see if his original document is shown. It could go one way or the other. It is YOU who is so certain of everything.

So don't give me this crap about how all it would take is just a $12 document. That's a lie and you know it.

What, the prices has gone up? Is it now $15.00? Actually, you have a point. *IF* his original birth certificate was sealed by court order, it might cost more than that, but it certainly wouldn't be as costly as having the military suspicious about the legitimacy of it's commander. I understand it has already cost the nation the services of a Medical doctor, plus the cost of his incarceration, all which could have been avoided had we not let the tail wag the dog.

By the way, What should a Military Officer do if he suspects his superior is an Enemy agent? Let us marvel at the genius of your answer!