Dr. Orly Taitz
Posted on 08/09/2011 8:50:00 AM PDT by SvenMagnussen
An outspoken critic who believes President Barack Obama's birth certificate is a forgery visited the Hawaii Department of Health on Monday.
Dr. Orly Taitz and two document experts were hoping to examine the president's original long-form birth certificate, but their request was denied.
Taitz then headed to U.S. District Court.
(Excerpt) Read more at khon2.com ...
Since Obama released it to the public, the information shouldn’t be considered “private” anymore.
wait. She didn’t think they would actually show her the empty file did she?
Not for or against Taitz myself but...
But do you have the class and maturity to add something substantive to the thread OR
...is all you are capable of is an ad-hom picture each time these threads come up?
=8-)
Pay no heed to Tex Con....just another dupe. How is the BHO and his dog BO different, BO has papers.
I treat the subject with the seriousness it merits.
While the animated pic may not be adding anything 'classy' to the thread, the main subject of the thread ain't adding any dignity or maturity herself.
If the pic gets anyone to stop and do a little research about Orly Taitz, it isn't a bad thing. Orly Taitz is regularly lauded on this forum as a patriot and she is represented as some kind of tireless fighter for a conservative cause. She is a mail order lawyer who reflects badly upon all who praise her.
I really have my own suspicions that she actually works for the Obama camp and, if so, she has earned whatever they pay her twice over. She is definitely no conservative champion.
I found your Mentor Tex.
An early influence, but not a mentor. William Gaines, however...
Many experts call it a fraudulent computer generated fake. No one has any proof otherwise. Obama’s release of this document was a slap in the face to the american people and shows his utter contempt for it’s people and laws. This goes way beyond a simple request to provide information called for in the law. It is most likely a eligability fraud commited by the top democrats to allow obama to qualify. The leftists morons defending this fraud would believe obama if he released his birth certificate written in crayons on a piece of toilet paper.
Nothing of substance on the thread? That the state of Hawaii refused a court order to allow Taitz and her experts see the the document is not of substance?
Go back to DU.
QUESTION OF WHY?
When the question rise regarding eligibility of Obama and McCain the Senate only considered McCain’s and not Obama’s WHY?
When Obama’s Kenyan grandmother stated she was present at his birth, Mr Jerome Corsi announced he would interview her in Kenya. Yet upon arrival was immediately detained for a period of time and permitted to leave the country. Why?
They released a computerized certificate of birth attesting to being born in Hawaii. When it was revealed that Hawaii routinely issued certificate of birth to many who never were actually born in the state became Why?
When the question of Obama’s birth certificate became a common question, Neil Abercrombie the newly elected Governor publicly state upon taking office will make his original long form made public. A few weeks after assuming office a reporter questioned him why he has not made it public. His reply was that he couldn’t find it but did know it existed. Why?
When Donald Trump made a big issue of his birth certificate they released what they stated was the official long form document on 24th of April. Then a number of document experts reported that it was a fraud. Why?
A federal Judge issued a subpoena to the Hawaiian Dept of Health to make available for inspection the original document within thirty days. On 8 August the Dept of Health refused to make the document available for privacy reasons. Why?
The so called document released on 24th of April contains of the same information expected on the original document. Why?
The Judge has scheduled a hearing on the 14 of September on why the subpoena was denied.
She did not have a court order.
Especially when you are present. You are anathema to substantive discussions; the literal equivalent of a monkey which throws poo at passersby.
I treat the subject with the seriousness it merits.
More like, all the seriousness of which you are capable. Even so, it's your best argument to date. Michelle Malkin recently did a story on idiots who play games with people's photographs. (So naturally I thought of you.) She uses this as an example.
Here is the story where you can get some more ideas to use in the place of your lack of intellectual arguments.
http://michellemalkin.com/2011/08/08/the-conservative-crazy-eyes-cliche-other-stupid-msm-photo-tricks/
Tex-Con-Man is being very useful indeed. A careful analysis of which posts brings him out of his hut indicates to us which stories are the most worrisome to the White House. And this is definitely one.
Honestly, do you folks realize how insane stuff like this makes you sound? Here's what you actually have in Orly. She is an incompetent lawyer who has repeatedly demonstrated an inability to comprehend court procedures, an inability to understand what a court is saying no matter how many times it tells her, and a losing record from here to infinity. That's all documented fact. To believe that anyone is worried about anything she is doing is either willful refusal to face reality, or an admission of hopeless gullibility.
She's an attention freak fleecing the gullible of their hard-earned dollars on a joke of a website.
Where do I find a copy of this court order of which you speak?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.