You know Newsweek sucks when the NAGS are taking up for Michele Bachmann...
1 posted on
08/08/2011 1:14:10 PM PDT by
Rufus2007
To: Rufus2007
Why would the harpy’s at NOW want to get ahead of this?
To: Rufus2007
Somehow I can see this really galling NOW to do this.
Odd though that they didn’t lift a finger during all the crap that Palin went through.
3 posted on
08/08/2011 1:16:15 PM PDT by
drbuzzard
(different league)
To: Rufus2007
Holy crap! A squadron of pigs just flew by my window!
4 posted on
08/08/2011 1:16:33 PM PDT by
henkster
(Ethanol belongs in a beer can, not a gas tank.)
To: Rufus2007
Did I die this morning?
What is this odd place?
6 posted on
08/08/2011 1:18:53 PM PDT by
Halfmanhalfamazing
( Media doesn't report, It advertises. So that last advertisement you just read, what was it worth?)
To: Rufus2007
8 posted on
08/08/2011 1:20:17 PM PDT by
Keith in Iowa
(Hope & Change - I'm out of hope, and change is all I have left every week | FR Class of 1998 |)
To: Rufus2007
This is the first time NOW has been right on anything in decades.
To: Rufus2007
NOW took a stand for Michele Bachmann? ? ? I don’t believe it. This story has to be from the “Onion.”
12 posted on
08/08/2011 1:28:07 PM PDT by
Realman30
("I've already made a donation to Haiti. It's called taxes". . . . El Rushbo.)
To: Rufus2007
14 posted on
08/08/2011 1:32:58 PM PDT by
Mears
To: Rufus2007
Please spell it correctly, it's:
Newsweak
16 posted on
08/08/2011 1:36:59 PM PDT by
central_va
( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Rufus2007
I suspect that it is simply because NOW fears the outside possibility that maybe, just maybe, Bachmann really IS the prophesied “Queen of Rage”.
If so, that would make her the boss of them.
17 posted on
08/08/2011 1:40:22 PM PDT by
BuddhaBrown
(Path to enlightenment: Four right turns, then go straight until you see the Light!)
To: Rufus2007
Rather typical for Newsweek. And you don't have to be a woman.
20 posted on
08/08/2011 2:03:42 PM PDT by
Leroy S. Mort
(Fiat justitia ruat caelum)
To: Rufus2007
Gloria Steinem has a very simple test: If this were done to a man or would it ever be done to a man – has it ever been done to a man? Surely this has never been done to a man.” This is a very weak test. Newsweek has done similarly degrading covers many times before, with George W Bush or other Republican politicians in the past.
24 posted on
08/08/2011 2:53:14 PM PDT by
paudio
(The differences between Clinton and 0bama? About a dozen of former Democratic Congressmen.)
To: Rufus2007
I keep telling people that in 2012 I’m voting for the hot chick.
If Sarah gets in the race, I’m gonna have to make a decision.
25 posted on
08/08/2011 3:12:29 PM PDT by
GEC
(We're not drilling in ANWR because....)
To: Rufus2007
You know Newsweek sucks Who reads Newsweek for political news? Newsweek has the 51st largest subscription behind "Women's Health", "Birds & Blooms", "Country Living", "Golf Digest", "Shape", and "Every Day with Rachael Ray", but ahead of "Fitness".
Perhaps they feel this cover will thrust them ahead of "Women's Health" into the number 50 spot.
26 posted on
08/08/2011 5:29:35 PM PDT by
MosesKnows
(Love many, Trust few, and always paddle your own canoe)
To: Rufus2007
Not just NOW,
The Slate is also defending her.
I'll say it, kudos to both for this.
27 posted on
08/08/2011 5:53:58 PM PDT by
TwelveOfTwenty
(Compassionate Conservatism? Promoting self reliance is compassionate. Promoting dependency is not.)
To: Rufus2007
PHOTOSHOP CONTEST?
Newsweek editor Tina Brown has some unflattering pics in “images” on google. How’s about a contest to find the worst one?
Then enhance it a bit?
29 posted on
08/08/2011 7:18:37 PM PDT by
cookcounty
(Nullius in Verba. "Take no man's word for it.")
To: Rufus2007
30 posted on
08/09/2011 11:46:51 AM PDT by
Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
(S&P wasn't worried about us not lifting the debt ceiling - they are worried about the spending)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
