Skip to comments.
Making Us Pay So Lindsay Lohan Can Get a Free IUD
http://libertarian-neocon.blogspot.com/2011/08/making-us-pay-so-lindsay-lohan-can-get.html ^
| libertarian neocon
Posted on 08/02/2011 12:46:01 PM PDT by libertarian neocon
On the heels of his unsuccessful attempt to raise taxes through the debt ceiling agreement, Obama has decided to lower everyone's take home pay another way, through regulation. The Department of Health and Human Services just announced a new regulation which sounds all warm and fuzzy on the surface, but is in fact another in the long list of idiotic & costly government regulations. It requires all new healthcare plans to cover, without the need for co-payment or any other form of cost-sharing, a number of services strictly for women (I guess since men tend to vote Republican, this administration doesn't really care as much about them):
- well-woman visits;
- screening for gestational diabetes;
- human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing for women 30 years and older;
- sexually-transmitted infection counseling;
- human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening and counseling;
- FDA-approved contraception methods and contraceptive counseling;
- breastfeeding support, supplies, and counseling; and
- domestic violence screening and counseling.
I have no problem with women getting any of these services but why shouldn't they have to pay for it, even just a little bit? It's not like any of these services are actually free, someone has to pay for it, you and me. Wasn't Obamacare supposed to "bend the cost curve down"? It's stupid regulations like this which is bending the cost curve up (even before this came out the Chief Actuary of Medicare said as much here). It's simple economics which even Paul Krugman can understand. By reducing the cost-sharing, premiums will go up that much more next year when businesses have to sign up for their plans. That's taking money out of employers' pockets which hurts salaries, bonuses and, importantly, new hiring. Why should we have to pay for contraception methods and counseling? Isn't it their choice to have sex? Why should I have to pay for their choices? Health insurance is supposed to be about making sure you aren't financially ruined by a car accident or cancer, it's not to make sure that Lindsay Lohan has an IUD free of charge. And the breastfeeding support and supplies? Aren't breastfeeding mothers already saving tons of money by not buying uber expensive baby formula? Why do we all need to pay for an additional incentive? On the domestic violence screening, does that mean that if you are a man you have to pay a co-pay but if you are a woman you don't? Also, if you take this "it's so important it should be free" argument to its logical conclusion, what will have a co-pay going forward? Why should I have to pay a co-pay for my kid's ear infections? If I don't take him to the doctor, won't fluid build up in his ears, increasing the likelihood he will need tubes surgically inserted? Also, why do ER visits have a higher copay? Aren't they emergencies? People might be holding off on getting treatment for serious injuries causing more serious complications down the road. Shouldn't they be free based on Obama's logic? There really is no end.
Prices are there for a reason. It's a way to naturally limit resource use so costs don't go through the roof. By making the price for the end user zero you will actually lead to overuse of a given resource. People who don't need something will get it because its free. Instead of asking their boyfriend/husband to go to the CVS to buy condoms they will get birth control pills from their doctor for free, something that is less expensive for that couple but more expensive for those of us actually paying for it. It's not that complicated.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: healthcare; obama; obamacare; regulation; unclesugar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: libertarian neocon
Making Us Pay So Lindsay Lohan Lindsey Graham Can Get a Free IUD More than one Lindsey has a uterus.
To: libertarian neocon
You see the hand that gives you the goody.
You don’t see the hand that picks your pocket.
3
posted on
08/02/2011 12:50:46 PM PDT
by
Haiku Guy
(If you have a right / To the service I provide / I must be a slave)
To: libertarian neocon
Preventing some people from spawning is money well spent.If Lindsey Lohan really needs an IUD,I’d be HAPPY to buy her one.
4
posted on
08/02/2011 12:50:53 PM PDT
by
Farmer Dean
(stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
To: libertarian neocon
Yes socialized medicine blows.
But if it DID keep LiLo from reproducing, what a benefit to society.
To: libertarian neocon
6
posted on
08/02/2011 12:51:00 PM PDT
by
arrogantsob
(Why do They hate her so much?)
To: libertarian neocon
The Department of Health and Human Services just announced a new regulation "Announced a new regulation..." ...in America? Can you imagine that?
And from Kathleen Sebelius, aka Governor Death.
7
posted on
08/02/2011 12:54:43 PM PDT
by
_a_0_0_
To: Thane_Banquo
More than one Lindsey has a uterus. So it's now OK for to have the US in one's uterus?
8
posted on
08/02/2011 12:54:48 PM PDT
by
_a_0_0_
To: Farmer Dean
And I would gladly make a donation to see if it works.
9
posted on
08/02/2011 12:56:57 PM PDT
by
Venturer
To: libertarian neocon
10
posted on
08/02/2011 1:00:08 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: libertarian neocon
The most sacred “right” of our government has to do with all imaginable sexual activity and behaviors except for pro-creation. Other people’s children ARE included.
To: libertarian neocon
This is nuts.
I think it’s being done to purposely drive up the cost of health insurance until people cry uncle and submit to the creation of a national health insurance plan.
To: libertarian neocon
FDA-approved contraception methods and contraceptive counseling How idiotic.
Anyone who has health insurance can't be destitute. Either they have a job with benefits or they can afford to pay high monthly premiums if self-employed.
Either way, they should be able to afford contraception.
Furthermore, since when should insurance be burdened with paying for recreational expenses?
What's next?
Have health insurance pay for beds and Fredericks of Hollywood accessories?
Maybe health insurance should pay for jogging sneakers and gym memberships, too.
To: libertarian neocon
Implant an IED by mistake instead of an IUD.
That would clean things up pretty good.
To: Farmer Dean
And even give her a few bucks to get spayed! The Humane Soc. can do it immediately, no waiting.
15
posted on
08/02/2011 1:23:29 PM PDT
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: Venturer
I’d load up on antibiotics before that encounter.
16
posted on
08/02/2011 1:26:33 PM PDT
by
Farmer Dean
(stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
To: Farmer Dean
Might be good advice.
LMAO.
17
posted on
08/02/2011 1:34:33 PM PDT
by
Venturer
To: libertarian neocon
They want to encourage women not to have children...ever.
18
posted on
08/02/2011 1:39:23 PM PDT
by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: libertarian neocon
I don’t mind paying for it, especially with the likes of her.
19
posted on
08/02/2011 2:20:56 PM PDT
by
bgill
To: _a_0_0_
So it's now OK for to have the US in one's uterus? p>I think we have a new Tea Party rally sign:
KEEP MY U.S. OUT OF YOUR UTERUS!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson