Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: what's up; Carling

You’re an idiot RINO propagandist:

“Regarding the debt limit deal, she went on to say that while it is a victory to change the debate toward talking about the debt, there is much more work to be done. She does acknowledge that the debt limit deal is a step in the right direction but she doesn’t like giving what she believes may be the most liberal President in US history another 2 trillion dollars that we don’t have with no major reforms.”


5 posted on 08/01/2011 9:13:12 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson

Yeah, that’s what I posted, Jim.

It’s a FACT. Why are you deleting facts, Jim?


8 posted on 08/01/2011 9:14:46 PM PDT by Carling (At some point, those surrounding Obama have to realize that they are working for a psychopath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Palin strongly opposed any debt limit increase, taking to her Facebook page to issue a veiled threat of “contested primaries” to freshmen members of Congress. But in the wake of the debt deal’s House passage Monday night, she acknowledged a partial victory for the tea party in turning the national conversation to spending and debt.
Nonetheless, she voiced displeasure with the concessions made to the president, and blasted the Republican House leadership.
“What happened to the pledge that our Congress has made to America, saying they would post bills online three days before they voted on them?” she said. “They’ve already broken that pledge, and doggone it, that’s what makes us disappointed in politicians in Washington, D.C.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0811/60458.html#ixzz1TqEQOAGU


19 posted on 08/01/2011 9:26:46 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
does acknowledge that the debt limit deal is a step in the right direction

That is a lot more positive spin on the bill than those that have been trashing Allen West for the past few days.

Nobody likes the bill, but Palin says the bill is "a step in the right direction", not "a step in the wrong direction" like some others.

That also suggests she would have supported voting FOR this bill, since it is "a step in the right direction", even though clearly she, and many others, would have wanted to take MORE steps in the right direction.

One of the things I like about Sarah is that she seems to understand taking what you can get, and then coming back to fight for more tomorrow.

23 posted on 08/01/2011 9:29:39 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
Those comments are uncalled for, Jim.

I have quoted Palin directly.

She does not like the bill 100% but she did use the word victory a couple of times in connection with it. Read the quotes...watch the video.

25 posted on 08/01/2011 9:33:11 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
“Regarding the debt limit deal, she went on to say that while it is a victory to change the debate toward talking about the debt, there is much more work to be done. She does acknowledge that the debt limit deal is a step in the right direction but she doesn’t like giving what she believes may be the most liberal President in US history another 2 trillion dollars that we don’t have with no major reforms.”


I am not convinced that it is a "step in the right direction". They may be talking about the debt and spending cuts, but those "cuts" are largely an illusion. The media has been calling this a Tea Party victory, while Tea Party activists do not consider it much of a victory. If I was to put my cynic hat on, I would guess that the idea is to pin the coming economic fallout in the wake of this deal on the Tea Party pressure to "cut spending", even though very little spending is really being cut. They could then turn around and say, "see we did it your way and cut spending and look where it got us". This would be followed by every economist that they could get to go along with them saying: "We told you that massive spending cuts in a weak economy would spell trouble. We need to invest more in the economy to put Americans back to work".

I am not sure that falling into this trap is helping the cause.
157 posted on 08/02/2011 2:25:54 PM PDT by rob777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson