first thing I do is look at the source of “news”. Anyone that thinks this is not agenda driven is a moron.
True, true.
In this case, however, the agenda isn’t necessarily what we’d think it is.
Adams’ companies make money on direct email (ie, “business spam”) software systems to send email ads to target customer bases. He claims that they’re based in Cody, WY... and the next time I’ve over there, I’ll see whether the address given is just his registered agent for his LLC or there is an actual company there.
The point being, this guy has some background in the Y2K “market” and I’m not entirely certain that he’s putting out these bumpf on “natural” foods and living for purely altruistic reasons. ie, he could well be generating leads for marketing campaigns from this sort of stuff...
...The study was issued by the National Research Council, which is affiliated with the National Academy of Sciences and provides advice to the nation under a Congressional charter.
Overuse of this seductively simple approach to weed control is starting to backfire. Use of Roundup, or its generic equivalent, glyphosate, has skyrocketed to the point that weeds are rapidly becoming resistant to the chemical.
That is rendering the technology less useful, requiring farmers to start using additional herbicides, some of them more toxic than glyphosate.
It wasn't long ago that Fukushima was a conspiracy created by left wing Greenpeace fanatics. Link below from FR nuke experts...great fun.
URGENT: Radiation 1,600 times normal level 20 km from Fukushima plant: IAEA - FR Thead
Do you dismiss the instructions on a bottle of antibiotics to complete the entire course as prescribed? (Even if Rush Limbaugh told you it was ok...lol)
If so - why?
Do you know why taking an incomplete course of ABX is not a good idea?
Can you draw any parallels to how the use of a broad spectrum pesticide can be completely ruled out as a potential equivalent of an incomplete course of ABX?