The evidence Obama’s long form BC was sealed is proven by the fact his short form BC has a “date filed.” The only vital records with a “date filed” are vital records created by Court Order.
Obama’s long form BC has a “date accepted” because it was created through witness attestation (signatures of mother, delivery doctor and hospital administrator). The registrar has a choice of indicating a “date received” or “date accepted” with witness attestation.
The only choice a registrar of vital records when there is a Court Order is “date filed.” A Court Order will only be issued to create a short form COLB if there is a corresponding Order to seal the original long form BC.
Check the internet. There are many people born in Hawaii who have long form BC’s with a “date accepted” and a short form BC with a “date accepted.”
Obama has a long form BC with a “date accepted” and a short form COLB with a “date filed” because his original long form BC was sealed by Court Order. The Court may have sealed the original long form BC because the Soetoro adoption was finalized or something else.
Obama’s long form BC has a “date accepted” because it was created through witness attestation (signatures of mother, delivery doctor and hospital administrator). The registrar has a choice of indicating a “date received” or “date accepted” with witness attestation.
The only choice a registrar of vital records when there is a Court Order is “date filed.” A Court Order will only be issued to create a short form COLB if there is a corresponding Order to seal the original long form BC.
Check the internet. There are many people born in Hawaii who have long form BC’s with a “date accepted” and a short form BC with a “date accepted.”
Obama has a long form BC with a “date accepted” and a short form COLB with a “date filed” because his original long form BC was sealed by Court Order. The Court may have sealed the original long form BC because the Soetoro adoption was finalized or something else.
This is an excellent point! I think I recall butterzillion making this point before as well. I just wasn't certain that this was indeed significant. I was speculating that a laid back state such as Hawaii, might not be very rigid in their methodologies and procedures. I noticed they changed their birth certificate stamp, so perhaps they changed their birth certificate nomenclature as well?
I will mark that down as further evidence of some sort of court proceeding such as an adoption or name change. I have long strongly suspected that there is some sort of court involvement with Barry's birth certificate. Nothing else makes any sense. Thanks for pointing that out, and explaining the significance of it.