Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Dakkster
I just noticed that some of my posts to you might appear that I’m questioning your comments but are actually general rhetorical questions. I’ll try to be more clear on the questions.

I understand. I sometimes think out loud as well. However, I don't mind people questioning my comments. If there is a hole in my thinking, I actually prefer that people point it out to me. Even now, I have been pondering something which Yaelle has said to me, trying to decide if it has merit or not.

She says that the nude Photographs of Stanley Ann Dunham MUST have been taken when she was much older than 18. (In 1960) If she is correct about this, then the Odds of Frank Davis being the father go down considerably.

In any case, I am considering her point till I find a way to either prove or disprove it.

315 posted on 08/03/2011 7:24:14 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Abortion is Murder and Democrats are evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Did Yaelle think Ann was much older (than 18) in 1960, or that the photos were taken of Ann later than the year 1960? What was her reason?

If so, do you think this would affect the odds that FMD was the father or just the odds of the FMD & ANN combination?


317 posted on 08/03/2011 7:53:04 AM PDT by Dakkster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson