Haven't seen any confirmation of this yet. But if true, then maybe the Dems blinked.
1 posted on
07/24/2011 2:37:11 PM PDT by
SDShack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: SDShack
To: SDShack
Reid to offer at "least $2.5 Trillion" in deficit redux w/ no revenue increasesAnd Zero Hedge also said, "If true, it is probably a ten year plan with deficit cuts on the back end. IOW, no deficit cuts."
Pretty clever...
56 posted on
07/24/2011 3:06:29 PM PDT by
John123
(US$ - I owe you nothing. Euro - Who owes you nothing.)
To: SDShack
Cuts first...no taxes later
If they cut spending why do they need a ceiling increase?
$2.5 Trillion over how many decades, Hairy?
59 posted on
07/24/2011 3:07:43 PM PDT by
hattend
(Its a matter of public record that I did not go to Harvard Law School, but I can add. - Sarah Palin)
To: SDShack
To: SDShack
75 posted on
07/24/2011 3:29:25 PM PDT by
Hildy
(Hollywood liberals once embraced Communism "because they hadn't invented Pilates yet"- David Mamet)
To: SDShack
Sounds like Reid has come up against some Ronald Reagans’.
78 posted on
07/24/2011 3:32:24 PM PDT by
shield
(Rev 2:9 "Woe unto those who say they are Judah and are not, but are of the synaGOGue of Satan.")
To: SDShack
They are caught Like Rats ,but they have, the Zippys golfing buddy, Orange Bonehead in their corner,He should of learned to negotiate, instead of Cry, something is bad wrong with this Dude!
80 posted on
07/24/2011 3:35:21 PM PDT by
Cheetahcat
( November 4 2008 ,A date that will live in Infamy.)
To: SDShack
Remember, for Democrats, going from a 10% increase to a 5% increase is a “cut”.
81 posted on
07/24/2011 3:38:16 PM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: SDShack
Who is Tyler Durden and why should we believe hin? This site is a blog.
83 posted on
07/24/2011 3:45:03 PM PDT by
Jean S
To: SDShack
About time. It will be interesting to see what he comes up with. Finally, we get to see what the Dems would do to reduce spending. You can bet there will increased taxes and major cuts in defense. Entitlements won't be touched. And the spending cuts will be made years from now.
And the baseline will interesting since the Dems increased discretionary spending by 24% over the past two years. Lots of smoke and mirrors, but at last we will have something to compare our plan with theirs. Should make for some interesting discussions. Let the games begin.
86 posted on
07/24/2011 3:50:15 PM PDT by
kabar
To: SDShack
It’s fake “cuts” like the last deal Obama cut with Bohner.
To: SDShack
Reid's plan would surely cut the military to the bone tomorrow and cut everything else when time is kept in star dates. Obama and Reid will not put their name on any plan that immediately cuts spending. They will leave it to the House, and then bemoan any cuts as mean-spirited Republican actions through 2012. They are w/out balls, whatsoever.
91 posted on
07/24/2011 3:56:57 PM PDT by
Shqipo
(I am the unofficial originator of the Mega-Bump! Only use judiciously.)
To: SDShack
If so, the GOPers must read. digest and vet every single word. TAKE NOTHING AT FACE VALUE!!! The dems are wired for treachery, so make absolutely sure there`s no gimmickry.
94 posted on
07/24/2011 4:09:40 PM PDT by
ScottinVA
(As a party that gives Obama what he wants, what again is the GOP`s 2012 selling point?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
