Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ross Perot Was Right
http://timiacono.com ^ | 07/18/2011 | Tim Iacono

Posted on 07/18/2011 11:48:57 AM PDT by JerseyHighlander

Ross Perot Was Right On July 18, 2011, in Economy, by Tim

Spotted over at Patrick.net this morning, 1992 Presidential candidate Ross Perot’s warning about a steady decline in U.S. wages from almost 20 years ago sounds quite prophetic. All you have to do is substitute “China” for “Mexico” when you hear about wages converging at six dollars an hour – ours going down, theirs going up.

Sadly, no one talks about his much – instead, you get a political debate about taxes and spending. And, of course, monetary policy at the Federal Reserve that is largely based on a consumer price index that doesn’t distinguish between imported goods and goods that are produced domestically only exacerbates the problem.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: Thane_Banquo
In all seriousness, the problem with my economics classes in college was that they were taught by a libertarian, which gave me more trust than I would have in most professors.

Someday perhaps you will tote a tag line in concert with mine. ; )

21 posted on 07/18/2011 12:13:55 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ngat

Than what?


22 posted on 07/18/2011 12:15:41 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FightThePower!
Are you so eager to believe what your banking masters tell you that you can’t see how many jobs have been lost from “Free Trade”

We need to free ourselves from this domination of freedom that has been forced upon us by God! /MS

23 posted on 07/18/2011 12:18:05 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Bingo and well said!


24 posted on 07/18/2011 12:19:02 PM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DManA

B.S. we still pay tariffs to the G20 nations while they don’t. You call THAT a good deal?

The only way free trade works is if everyone is playing by the same rules.


25 posted on 07/18/2011 12:21:09 PM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FightThePower!

It only fails because our own government puts the shackles on us.

Business based in the U.S. have to play by their own set of ludicrous rules that puts them at a stark disadvantage in the world.

This is a big-government problem, not a free trade problem.


26 posted on 07/18/2011 12:22:44 PM PDT by rjeffries
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

I counted 3 nations of the G20 with which the US has free trade agreements. Setting the US aside, that leaves 16 nations in the G20 who pay tariffs into the US Treasury.


27 posted on 07/18/2011 12:27:41 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander

It was noted long ago that an idea would take hold in America and one could not shake it. We have been victims of the influence of narrow minded Free Trade fanatics over the last forty to fifty years. This bizarre 18th century ideation is certainly one of the factors sending the American economy into a tail spin. The others being: EEOP, regulations, Environmentalism, a tax system out of control, the collapsing social system, bad morals etc. etc.


28 posted on 07/18/2011 12:35:04 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander

Ross Perot was right and the free traitors were and are wrong.

The free traitors will say, but, but what about inflation if we produce our own products.

The US produced most of its products for most of its history without massive inflation.

How is it that the US could exist all those years with every consumer product known to man and the average consumer was able to afford it all?

How it is that the American standard of living was already the best in the world before all this outsourcing?

Before Japan, China, Taiwan, India, South Korea, Mexico came on to the scene, the US was producing and consuming just fine.

Nobody was suffering and starving because we weren’t buying crap from China.


29 posted on 07/18/2011 12:42:13 PM PDT by radpolis (Liberals: You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Instead of “then”.


30 posted on 07/18/2011 12:47:16 PM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ngat

Really? The wealth of our nation is being systematically looted and all you can do is play silly chat room games?

Sigh.


31 posted on 07/18/2011 12:52:46 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander
Those who are losing at a competition always blame the other side and/or the referees. That doesn't change the outcome, but the loser thinks he feels better.

After one decides who to blame (and anyone will do, since it is the placing of blame that is important), what's next?

Protectionism won't solve the problem. Protectionism (which is collectivism) will produce inferior products at a higher price. Eventually the old Soviet joke becomes a truism. “Everyone’s working but there's nothing on the shelves.” Why would we turn to a failed system to “protect” us?

The solution is twofold. Compete where you have equality or advantage. Where you can't compete, don't. Simply take advantage of the cheap goods available and buy them. Competing directly against extremely cheap labor is impossible. How many times do we have to learn that lesson? It's been evident for centuries.

We must retrain our labor force to perform at a higher level than people overseas who can push a couple of buttons on a factory machine or do piecework for a few cents an hour. Like everything else about this economic situation, the fix is going to take a long time.

I forgot about saving the country or the world long ago. I got busy and saved myself. I learned how to compete with people in my industry who underpriced me by not competing with them on price, but on trust.

I left the world-saving to the lefties. This left me with a few important lessons:

You can't make a good deal with a bad guy.
Beware the naked man who offers you his shirt.
Never sign anything in a room with a chandelier.
Don't trust anyone who wears sunglasses inside.
The amateur always blames the equipment.

32 posted on 07/18/2011 1:03:18 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Throw away your papers, blow up your TV...and set yourself free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

I was in Uni as a Finance major undergrad when I first found FR.

Recently did a spring cleaning and had to decide whether to keep or toss my undergrad textbooks. The theories espoused in those econ books will be as discredited as phrenology by the time my own kids attend college some day.

I was under the same disillusion as my econ professor was a national level Libertarian at the time. Overcoming Confirmation Bias is a hard process to accept, especially as I focused my studies on a field that is looking worse for wear by the hour in these difficult times.


33 posted on 07/18/2011 1:06:31 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Really? All you can do is take shots a patriot of enormous accomplishment who had it figured out in 1992 that the Bushes and the Clintons were on the same page, started a third Party with his own personal money to give the people a choice, and when things work out badly, exactly as the successful entrepeneur predicted, all you can do is say he was wrong? Plus, you don’t even know the difference in English usage between then and than?


34 posted on 07/18/2011 1:23:26 PM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ngat
Trying to exploit a typo is a ploy punks pull when they run out of arguments.

Plus, you don’t even know the difference in English usage between then and than?

I give people the benefit of the doubt.

35 posted on 07/18/2011 1:30:30 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Boop Their Bottle Noses!

Flying Dolphins Say Support Free Republic

Give what you can
Only Five More New Monthly Donors Needed for the Current Challenge
A sponsoring FReeper will contribute $10
For Each One

36 posted on 07/18/2011 1:33:47 PM PDT by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

NO disagreement here but I fear you still believe in collectivism in the sense you want to retrain your fellow AMericans in the workforce to go upmarket and compete at higher profit margins.

Having worked as a PC/computer/IT certification instructor during President Bush’s big drive to retrain the workforce after the 2001 recession, all I can tell you is that
1. Most of the students were untrainable
2. Most of the students were receiving Gov loans/grants
3. There was almost no net benefit to the individuals or the economy as a whole from those retraining programs.

The only people really helped by that private IT school I worked at were younger minority students who couldn’t afford a community college but had potential, and immigrants who had potential but limited opportunities.

“Never sign anything in a room with a chandelier.” - That is going to stick with me.


37 posted on 07/18/2011 1:35:41 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
"For the most part, we have free trade with Canada and Mexico. We do not have free trade with China.

Canada and Mexico happen to be our largest trading partners."


Free Trade with Mexico is probably not a good example for you to make. We put alot of their farmers out of business with cheap corn. In turn, millions of displaced ag workers flooded across the borders, overwhelmed our educational and public assistance systems, and displaced native workers.

You're right. We don't have "free trade" with China. It's worse than that. We give them pretty hefty advantages over our domestic businesses. They get to sell into our markets basically duty-free, but don't have to pay into our system. Meanwhile, there are prohibitive market barriers to selling into China unless you're talking ag products or raw resources. Our trade relationship with China is skewed quite heavily in their favor. Having to deal with the EPA and OSHA doesn't help, but that's not really the whole story.
38 posted on 07/18/2011 1:35:41 PM PDT by CowboyJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Have you ever heard of these treaties? AFTA, CEFTA, COMESA, GAFTA, GCC, NAFTA, SAFTA, SICA, TPP?

BTW, the average Tarrif in 2010 was 1.3%. So it mine as well be free. I get hit with a higher local sales tax.

China manipulates their currency, does not have an EPA, EEOC, Minimum wage law and does not pay tariffs to us. This is why so many businesses are building there. It’s not a level playing field.

It’s like playing a poker game and they have one set of rules and we have another. The way the game is currently set up... we will lose.


39 posted on 07/18/2011 1:38:42 PM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander

The skill levels are converging too.


40 posted on 07/18/2011 1:44:11 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson