[DiogenesLamp]

I would advise anyone pursuing the hypothetical theory presented above to go to a judge and present their evidence and see if a judge will issue a court order for all records pertaining to the birth of one Barack Hussein Obama II that the state of Hawaii may possess. That way Hawaii’s privacy statutes, Article II, Section 1 and Article IV, Section 1 all can be honored.

I would have no problem at all with any state or federal Court ruling that Article II, Section 1 takes primacy over Hawaii’s privacy statutes but I see no need for such a ruling since Hawaii law provides a method for satisfying both state and federal law.

Ladies and Gentleman of the Jury,the Witness presumably did not understand the question. We are not INTERESTED in what you think a Judge will do. We are interested in knowing if *YOU* believe that a State Law should triumph in covering up a lack of ARTICLE II eligibility? This is a question of *YOUR* intellectual honesty, not whether courts can go through motions.

This is a yes or no question. Do you believe state privacy laws should be allowed to permit an individual to skirt Article II compliance?

I had the gall to reference the 4th ARTICLE of the US Constitution not the 4th AMENDMENT to the US Constitution. I’ll assume that you do know the difference between articles and amendments and that you just misread.

You got me on that one. I was in error. You are correct, I am incorrect. That actually makes me feel better, because I regarded invoking the 4th amendment as unbelievable chutzpah.

[jh4freedom]

Ladies and Gentleman of the Jury,the Witness presumably did not understand the question. We are not INTERESTED in what you think a Judge will do. We are interested in knowing if *YOU* believe that a State Law should triumph in covering up a lack of ARTICLE II eligibility? This is a question of *YOUR* intellectual honesty, not whether courts can go through motions.

This is a yes or no question. Do you believe state privacy laws should be allowed to permit an individual to skirt Article II compliance?

No, I definitely do not believe that state privacy laws ever should be allowed to permit an individual to skirt Article II compliance.

However your attempt at posing a false choice fallacy is irrelevant since state privacy laws and Article II, Section 1 compliance can clearly go hand in hand under existing Hawaii statutes.

Now let me pose a question to you.
Who is it that you think should decide whether a state’s privacy laws are indeed permitting an individual to skirt Article II compliance?