[Kleon]

You're kidding, aren't you?

No, I'm not. First of all, it's foolish to be doing this kind of analysis on what is likely a copy of a copy. Second, one of those letters is on the fold of the paper.

[DiogenesLamp]

No, I'm not. First of all, it's foolish to be doing this kind of analysis on what is likely a copy of a copy. Second, one of those letters is on the fold of the paper.

Were it an actual "COPY" it would not have the peculiar characteristic of changing Pixel size and bit depth between a string of text characters.

Note the circled pixels?