There is NO such thing as a neo-con. It is a Treason Media MYTH. Nor was Palin ever any such thing. I do not care what that silly little article claims it is irrelevant to anything real.
Of course, I am not interesting in discussing this MYTH particularly when neo-con is not defined.
No, “everybody” is not using this fraudulent title which NEVER applied to Palin or anyone anyone ever heard of. Palin has changed NOTHING about her philosophy.
A “realist” is not a school of thought opposed to a “neo-con” either. Why are you insisting on pushing this crap? Why do you refuse to discuss what it is supposed to mean? If you bring up something you have to be able to discuss and tell people what it is supposed to mean. Just quoting some obscure hack is not sufficient.
Where did your erroneous idea that she was “tied” to neo-cons come from?
Randy S. has never been of interest to anyone not even the tiny number who has heard of him. The cleaning lady is more significant. His leaving is as important as her getting rid of the old cleaning lady and hiring another.
You’re arguing against the common understanding.
You might want to argue that the sun rises in the West. It doesn’t.
There is such a thing as neocon and such a thing as realist.
I don’t really want to explain these things to you. Try doing a google search or something.
Bill Kristol, a neocon, was tied to Palin. I’m not sure exactly how close a tie that really was, or is.
It’s not like Bill Kristol was Palin’s Campaign Manager when she ran for Mayor of Wasilla.
When people try to figure out what Palin what Palin’s going to do, Palin isn’t that tied to one school of thought, but if any, she’s more associated with neocon than anything. But she seems to be moving away from neocon.