Obviously you haven’t followed the case closely, or you’d know that dna tests have already been made, and neither Lee nor George was the father of Caylee. Since you are so far off the mark on that little theory, it’s hard to take anything else you say on the topic seriously.
“I wanted more” to borrow foremoron’s words, from this jury. I wanted a respectable length of deliberations. No way could they have gone through even 10% of the evidence. BTW, newbie freepers, like Upchuck not OK, who trolled in just today, are probably part of a pr blitz paid for by guess who.
I am willing to forgive the jurors and offer them a free trip to our local aquarium to view other jelly fish.
The case, from a logical standpoint can be reasoned fairly easily on just one piece of evidence: the unique duct tape. Yes, truthkeeper there is tons of other evidence, but I would convict murder in the first on the tape alone Why? The unique tape boils it down to the 4 Anthony's having access to it. Cindy can be eliminated from her first call_either that or you've got to believe she deserves a sidewalk award in Hollywood.
George can be eliminated based on his actions and testimony. What person would go to the ends of the earth in searching post 7-16?
Truthfully, Lee neither through testimony or actions is that compelling to discount as a possible suspect, but Casey claimed she talked to Caylee and so the only possibility could be that she was covering for Lee.
Again, I'm only dealing with ONE piece of evidence, as well as the demeanor and actions of the rest of the family. If Lee were involved, then Casey in claiming she spoke to the deceased Caylee would be willing to face the death penalty rather than giving up her brother. Right.
I'm forever done with Whorealdo and Hannity on this one, and Levin better allow some rebuttal for his uninformed remarks as well.
I saw the whole trial as I was recovering from broken ribs and various other injuries perpetrated by a sweet looking couple in their mid twenties.