Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy; reaganaut
Both prosecutor and defense counsel very actively try to load the jury with people of low intelligence, more impressed with emotional argument than facts. It has been proven that juries will acquit guilty people who are attractive, and convict ugly people who are clearly innocent. Defense counsels arrange for defendants to be given tranquilizers before the trial, so they just sit there with a blank, but attentive expression on their face.

Very interesting post....and certainly supports my take on the matter of jurors in the Casey trial...and concerns about attorneys having a say in appointing jurors.

I know that Casey was known to ask for sedatives while in jail. And might explain her controlled demeaner throughout the trial. For a woman known to not have control of her emotions she certainly had no problem doing so during the trial...might very well have been drugged prior. And no wonder we thought the jurors were lamebrains...apparently they do pick those who are just that. Would your husband attorney agree with what's said in that post Reagan???

46 posted on 07/17/2011 8:21:42 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: mrreaganaut

Opinion ping to #46


49 posted on 07/17/2011 8:30:52 PM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost, but now am found; was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: caww; yefragetuwrabrumuy

I pinged hubby to respond directly.


50 posted on 07/17/2011 8:42:12 PM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost, but now am found; was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: caww; reaganaut
And no wonder we thought the jurors were lamebrains...apparently they do pick those who are just that.

Well, the idea is to get jurors with no preconceived notions about the outcome of the case. Unfortunately, this does often translate into jurors with no ideas at all in their heads. Lawyers and judges have a tendency to think of themselves as the smartest people in the room, and this bias shows in jury selection. It looks like the prosecution was too smart for its own good in this case.

(It's also a good reason to vote for businessmen rather than lawyers, given a choice.)

52 posted on 07/17/2011 8:46:42 PM PDT by mrreaganaut (weltschmerz: the sadness one feels when contemplating how far the real world is from an ideal world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: caww

I always thought she might have been drugged during the trial.


53 posted on 07/17/2011 8:51:01 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: caww

I think that point was brought up on one of the talking head shows. Someone on the show said they thought she might be on some sort of drug. But do remember that look of rage caught on camera—so if she was drugged, it kind of slipped at that point.


74 posted on 07/18/2011 6:45:50 AM PDT by MizSterious (Apparently, there's no honor when it comes to someone else's retirement funds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson