But who gets to decide what the Constitution means by Natural Born Citizen?
That’s been decided a long time ago, but a few refuse to accept reality:
The Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814)
Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 3 Pet. 242 242 (1830)
Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875)
United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
All four of these cases held essentially the samr definition: That two citizen parents are require.
But the squirmers try to find a wiggle word somewhere in the decisions to frasp at rather than just accepting what the court held four times.
That’s been decided a long time ago, but a few refuse to accept reality:
The Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814)
Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 3 Pet. 242 242 (1830)
Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875)
United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
All four of these cases held essentially the sam
e definition: That two citizen parents are require.
But the squirmers try to find a wiggle word somewhere in the decisions to frasp at rather than just accepting what the court held four times.