Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

David Frum said that the 1990 budget deal was a success because spending/GDP declined in the 1990s. He wants to give Bush 1 credit for the GOP Congress.

Take this article and others I found to the fight to the Libs on their own turf; put the Left on the defensive at at Digg and at Reddit and in Stumbleupon and Delicious

1 posted on 07/11/2011 10:02:05 AM PDT by 92nina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 92nina

This argument is so stupid. George HW Bush did not say, “no new taxes”, he said, “no nude Texans”.


2 posted on 07/11/2011 10:12:10 AM PDT by svcw (democrats are liars, it's a given)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 92nina; Jim Robinson; ConjunctionJunction; Al B.; SolidWood; Leisler; greyfoxx39; ...

What is the connection of the site you’ve linked to
to Grover Norquist and the proillegal alien
and proSharia wings of the GOP?

Are the illegals and Sharia now triangulating
with Canadian RINOs?


4 posted on 07/11/2011 10:15:30 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Nothing surpasses the complexity of the human mind. - Leto II: Dar-es-Balat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 92nina

David Frump knows the “Read my lips” tax double cross got Clinton elected. Of course he thinks it was a good thing. If there is one thing progressive Republicans love, it is bigger, costlier government. They love government growth and intrusion more than liberals do. That’s why we need to take the next election as an opportunity to rid ourselves of the progressive, liberal plague. This is the time to do it.


5 posted on 07/11/2011 10:15:47 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 92nina

Frummykins, even IF you are correct about the spending cuts: Bush 41 didn’t promise “No New Taxes UNLESS there are cuts.” He promised NO NEW TAXES. His breach of that promise made him a one-termer, as millions of pissed-off fiscal conservatives voted for Perot or even Clinton (or just stayed home).


6 posted on 07/11/2011 10:17:22 AM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 92nina

No doubt at this point... frum is truly a drooling idiot.

LLS


7 posted on 07/11/2011 10:17:57 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ("GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH"! I choose LIBERTY and PALIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 92nina

What’s worse is that Zero’s “stimulus” spending has now raised the baseline by hundreds of billions of dollars.


9 posted on 07/11/2011 10:27:11 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 92nina

We would have more tax revenue if we had more taxpayers.


10 posted on 07/11/2011 11:01:16 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 92nina
When I have to resort to quoting David Frum to defend the indefensible ....

Frum is as liberal as it is possible to be and still lay claim to being a Republican.

11 posted on 07/11/2011 11:05:40 AM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson