What reason would the Dunhams have for adopting another woman's child (who just happens to look exactly like Grandfather Stanley) if the woman was unrelated to them?
Till I see better proof, "Anna" is Stanley Ann, as far as I'm concerned. I've seen several articles claiming she HATED the name "Stanley" and preferred to go by the name "Ann" or "Anna". This name for her is even used in one of Obama's books. The notion that she would hate the name "Stanley" and go through life referring to herself as "Ann" seems quite reasonable to me.
I’ve never seen any articles that she hated the name Stanley, in fact I’ve seen articles that she used “Stanley” or “Stannie” or “Stanley Ann” her whole life. There is no evidence whatsoever that she ever, ever used the name “Anna”. None. Zilch.
So you’re using 0bama’s books as evidence? THey’re mere propaganda to prop up his false “life”. Sheesh.
If you read many of the long reserach threads and leave your mind open you will see that it is most likely that neither purported parent is real.
He doesn't look exactly like Stanley D, he looks exactly like Malcom X. Stanley Ann started taking care of him when he was around three. Not one - NOT ONE - photo of her and him together until he was around three. NOT ONE. Don't you think the Zero publicity/propaganda dept. would have issued one if they had one? The Dunham clan were tight with Frank Marshall Davis - a member of the Communist Party - they were fellow commies. Anything to help "the cause".