Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: mlo; Moby Grape
"Once again, the defense was under no burden to prove anything."

Who said they were?

Moby Grape did in an earlier post.

“Flawed reasoning. There was NO evidence presented by the defense that she died accidentally, only conjecture. Since when is a “possibility” grounds for reasonable doubt.”
Evidence needs to be provided to prove something; conjecture as to possibilities can be raised and needs no evidence to prove it. The defense doesn't have to prove something happened for the jury to consider it possible.
87 posted on 07/08/2011 5:53:35 PM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: Bob

Bob, you are correct. It seems people here think the defense are suppose to “prove” something.

In a trial, each side, (the prosecution and the defense) presents a theory about what happened but only the prosecution has any responsibilty to prove their theory.

If the prosecution fails to prove their theory to the jurors, they will find the defendent not guilty.


89 posted on 07/08/2011 6:04:34 PM PDT by tirednvirginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson