>>Jury of morons found no child abuse.
The writer is a fool.<<
They were not looking for child abuse. They were not asked to give an opinion on child abuse. They were asked to give an opinion on whether or not the mother committed First Degree Murder. The answer was no.
I wonder what they would say if asked if they thought she abused her child. Not that is is relevant to the court.
Nonsense, she was also charged with aggravated child abuse and acquitted. Maybe if she had waited two months to report her missing daughter, went out dancing a few more times while her daughter lay rotting in a swamp and put a few more wraps of duct tape on Caylee's head she would have been found guilty of the abuse charge.
A lot of Freepers are looking real stupid, you including:
Count One: First Degree Murder Count Two: Aggravated Child Abuse Count Three: Aggravated Manslaughter of a Child Count Four: False Information