Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: LowTaxesEqualsProsperity

>>Jury of morons found no child abuse.

The writer is a fool.<<

They were not looking for child abuse. They were not asked to give an opinion on child abuse. They were asked to give an opinion on whether or not the mother committed First Degree Murder. The answer was no.

I wonder what they would say if asked if they thought she abused her child. Not that is is relevant to the court.


20 posted on 07/07/2011 2:09:41 PM PDT by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: RobRoy
They were not looking for child abuse. They were not asked to give an opinion on child abuse. They were asked to give an opinion on whether or not the mother committed First Degree Murder. The answer was no.

Nonsense, she was also charged with aggravated child abuse and acquitted. Maybe if she had waited two months to report her missing daughter, went out dancing a few more times while her daughter lay rotting in a swamp and put a few more wraps of duct tape on Caylee's head she would have been found guilty of the abuse charge.

35 posted on 07/07/2011 2:30:59 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: RobRoy
They were not looking for child abuse.

A lot of Freepers are looking real stupid, you including:

Count One: First Degree Murder
Count Two: Aggravated Child Abuse
Count Three: Aggravated Manslaughter of a Child
Count Four: False Information

64 posted on 07/08/2011 3:04:12 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson