Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: trisham

Yes.

But this post is saying that Bachman is, basically, disqualified because she doesn’t have “executive experience.”

I don’t agree with that.

That’s separate, though, from whether she is the best candidate for POTUS.


24 posted on 07/02/2011 4:38:32 PM PDT by fightinJAG (I am sick of people adding their comments to titles in the title box. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: fightinJAG

It’s a weakness, imho. However, I also believe that she is still a better candidate than many of the others out there, regardless.


25 posted on 07/02/2011 4:42:30 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG

Here I must disagree, only because she does have experience running organizations.

The reason you keep being told she doesn’t have any is because the ones saying so have nothing but contempt for the type of experience running things that she has.

She ran the business side of a dairy farm. She ran a huge household. She started and ran her own business that employed 30 people.

This is Tea Party member type of experience.

It’s instructive to see who on here has no use for it.


35 posted on 07/02/2011 8:34:24 PM PDT by txrangerette ("...HOLD TO THE TRUTH; SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR." - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson