Replies

Is there a vast conspiracy?

Prior to Barry's smiley faced forged LFBC being release, I had written (again) to my (allegedly Conservative) "representative" to both D.C. and local offices.

I kept the letter very, very short and to the point. I simply asked how someone who was admittedly born a subject to the British crown could possibly be considered a "natural born Citizen" of the U.S.

I said nothing about his B.C. or lack thereof.

The reply I got back was, paraphrasing: 1) Barry won the election, we need to abide by it and 2) Barry has shown (the short form at that time) his HI b.c.

I responded back stating that I said or asked nothing of his B.C. and reiterated my single sentence question.

I never heard from them again.

Conspiracy? Sure looks and smells like one.

HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN?

Office	Citizenship	Age	Residency (or years citizen)
President & Commander in Chief (1 of 1)	natural born Citizen	35	14 years resident
Senator (1 of many)	Citizen	30	9 years a Citizen
Represantative (1 of many)	Citizen	25	7 years a Citizen

Assuming Barry's father really was Obama Sr., Barry was born a subject to the crown of her majesty the Queen of England, inheriting his foreign father's foreign citizenship by birthright.
Then, when Kenyan gained it's independence, Barry obtained Kenyan citizenship at age ~2.
He possibly even had Indonesian citizenship if his step father Lolo Soetoro adopted him.

Forget dual citizen...Barry was/is a multi-national. He never was a "natural born Citizen."

Question is, do enough people care in the present day that Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution is currently being completely ignored? Where are all the "Constitutionalists?"

The fix was in very early on.

“...the April 3, 2009 CRS “Maskell Memorandum” [Mr.Jack Maskell - a lawyer at the Congressional Research Service](hereinafter “CRS Memo”) addressing presidential eligibility, intentionally and substantively modified the language of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 at 330, in order to accomplish the result sought. The modification, through application of a grammatical ellipsis, seems clearly calculated to have made it appear that the Supreme Court has already strongly intimated, if not outright held, that if one is a “native born citizen,” then one is also a “natural born Citizen” under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution...”

Per the Post & Email - http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/07/04/of-tricks-schemes-and-devices/

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

I’ve found it peculiar that so many Congressional members kept stating the same thing: native born citizen equals natural born citizen.

CRS appears to be the suspect source providing Congress with disinformation.

Consider:

“...the action taken (i.e., responding to congressional requests for the preparation of a legal memo addressing presidential eligibility under the Constitution) was plainly within the jurisdiction of the Congress, both under federal law – 2 U.S.C. § 166(d)(1) – as well as the Constitution — Article 2, Section 1, Clause 4 regarding the formal tallying of electoral college votes.”

This is criminal and constitutes violations of and criminal offenses under the federal “Fraud and False Statements” statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Someone is going to prison.