Posted on 07/01/2011 4:01:29 PM PDT by SatinDoll
Hey, bushpilot1, could you help out?
Go to the link given by butter above and do a screen capture of every instance of "minor" in a search. Lower case without a check in the "match case" box.
I don't do screen captures and you're a pro at it.
BTW, butter, anybody going to the link you've given can do the same search on "minor" and see the results.
A problem they’ve had since 2008, and just fixed now!
There is no substitute for shining the light of truth on an issue.
No, I don't.
I have no idea; for all I know it happens when they update their links.
What's important is that it can be observed even on cases not relating to eligibility.
Not sure why freedomwarrior998 is so passionate in his adamant rush to refute the info, to the extent of insulting members. If there’s no fruit to be borne, time will tell. I’m ordinarily no conspiracy buff, but I’m also tired of being expected to turn a blind eye to loose ends that don’t make sense, and this White House is one huge tangle of loose ends.
There’s no mention of Minor v Happersett in that page. Is that what you were seeking?
This is the notation at the top of the page:
This is Google’s cache of http://supreme.justia.com/us/143/135/case.html. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Jun 21, 2011 08:46:58 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more
~~~~
So, that’s not the current page?
Google Cached Pages
Clicking on that link takes you to the Google cached version of that web page, instead of the current version of the page.
Snip...When Google displays the cached page, a header at the top serves as a reminder that what you see isn’t necessarily the most recent version of the page.
Snip...This is useful if the original page is unavailable because of:
The owner’s recently removing the page from the Web
Yeah, only if you live in a city. It's long-since past time to get the hell out of Dodge.
Burn baby burn!
OK .. thanks.
Thank you for posting this article
I sent this to my Congressman & Senator
The 800 pound gorilla, or the pink elephant, if you prefer, in the room is of course the obvious reason for ineligibility that we all know....
A natural born US citizen is born on US soil and has 2 American citizen parents.
Barry Barack Obama Soetoro “wrote” (well, Ayers did) a whole book around his Kenyan father.
Whatever fake certificates he can fabricate, his own words condemn him as ineligible. “Dreams from my father”, a Kenyan.
Why is it that no one in the media or politics or anywhere, just says this simple truth? He’s not eligible because his father was not an American. It’s so simple.
But no, Obozo leads the nation around by the nose, taunting us with one fake BC after another, joking about having to plaster it to his forehead....etc.
When it actually doesn’t matter if he were born on the Moon. Daddy was not an American, and Barry is a usurper.
He just happens to have enough melanin to get away with all of this. It’s the soft racism of low expectations, and he used it all the way to The White House, and will punish America for the full 4 years of his miserable term.
(We'll see rather quickly which ones pull the assignment for this thread.)
You’re the man! TYVM.
If you go to the Wayback Machine via web.archive.org you can look at Justia’s archived citations of the case from before 2008. Here’s the URL for Oct. 31, 2006:
http://web.archive.org/web/20061031102938/http://supreme.justia.com/us/143/135/case.html
On that date and through Feb. 19, 2008, the citation reads, “As remarked by Mr. Chief Justice WAITE in Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162, 167:”
As of May 19, 2008 and at least through June 25, 2009, the citation reads, “As remarked by Mr. Chief Justice Waite in @ 88 U. S. 167:”
The URL to that archived record is:
http://web.archive.org/web/20080518172703/http://supreme.justia.com/us/143/135/case.html
There can’t be much question that early in 2008 someone tampered with Justia’s record of the court decision. Now Justia’s record has been changed once again (sometime after June 25, 2009), back to the original, correct case name and reference number.
The game’s afoot, Watson.
RS and others told me about screenhunter.
RS is the expert...me novice.
http://download.cnet.com/ScreenHunter-Free/3000-2192_4-10063246.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.