[Mad Dawgg]

"The answer is - no."

Really?

Now remember the question is does such open them up to a lawsuit. Not whether they are guilty of such.

And further understand even if such does not actually go to actual trial that still was not my question. My question is does such open them up to a lawsuit?

Even if such a suit does not make it to litigation (and do you really trust the legal system that is rife with liberal judges to deny cert in such a case?) Free Republic would still need lawyer to answer such a charge and if they didn't retain legal counsel and submit the required documents the opposing counsel would have field day.

All such things cost mucho dollars and if memory serves the FRepathons are not bringing in the same bucks as they used to which is understandable being our economy is in the toilet and folks have less money to give!

[shibumi]

"Really?"

Yes. Really.

Hypothetical hyperbole notwithstanding.

[TheOldLady]

But since we are talking about the OP on this thread, Neoavatara, all of your arguments are straw men. Are you accusing Neoavatara of plagiarism?

You're setting up straw hypothetical arguments to obfuscate the issue of Neoavatara's blog pimping. As usual, you're resorting to smoke and mirrors.

If Neoavatara posts his entire content here, Free Republic is in no danger of copyright infringement. And that is the argument on this particular thread.

All your other arguments are just so much drivel.

, Sensei.