That's a pretty broad based and vague rebuttal. She changed her story about the date? She changed her story about the Visit? She changed her story about the Diaper?
I've personally watched the video and read the interview, so I would be very interested to know what she could have changed her story to that would revoke what she had already said. What is it that she changed her story about?
In any case, I believe there is more than one person that claims to have seen Stanley in Seattle Subsequent to August 1961.
If you read the long research threads, you’ll find all the info. I’m a reader, not a researcher. I know that she either changed her story, and/or part of it was pulled.
She’s an 0bama supporter and they will lie and are not trustworthy. No on else has said they saw Stanley in WA other than Mary Toutonghi the baby sitter, but she originally said she baby sat “Anna’s” child, not Stanley’s, and the timing was way off, didn’t fit.
The problem is people are swallowing the myths in Dreams and not realizing that much more of it is false than they realize. Trying to stuff round pegs in square holes when the simplest explanation is the real one.
You may believe this or that, but no one other than Blake and then later Mary (changed her story too, after being contacted) claims to have seen Stanley in WA. And no records other than the Polk listing that says “Anna Obama” and Stanley never went by the name Anna, ever ever ever.
Do your own reading and you’ll see. If people read the long research threads especially the “Auntie” thread with an open mind - be willing to learn - be willing to admit “Hey, I’ve been wrong” - you’ll see. If not, you won’t.