No state would refuse to accept Hawaii's document. Hawaii just insists on producing a document which doesn't prove anything, while pointing at rules saying they don't have to produce the real document in their possession.
As I keep insisting, Constitutional requirements are not subject to laws by congress or states, or "rules" created by the federal government courts. The ONLY thing constitutional articles are subject to is an Amendment. Unless you pull out one of those, you need to stop talking about rules inferior to the law they wish to circumvent.
No state would refuse to accept Hawaii’s document. Hawaii just insists on producing a document which doesn’t prove anything, while pointing at rules saying they don’t have to produce the real document in their possession.
As I keep insisting, Constitutional requirements are not subject to laws by congress or states, or “rules” created by the federal government courts. The ONLY thing constitutional articles are subject to is an Amendment. Unless you pull out one of those, you need to stop talking about rules inferior to the law they wish to circumvent.
Who is it who determines whether constitutional provisions have been appropriately implemented, in your opinion?