I had already cited it to the pear-reviewed literature of the discipline, earlier in the thread, but here it is again:“...That native-born citizens are natural born citizens was clear and settled long ago,..”You’re full of crap and spreading lies.
"It is clear enough that native-born citizens are eligible and that naturalized citizens are not." [Charles Gordon, Who Can Be President of the United States: The Unresolved Enigma, 28 Md. L. Rev. 1, 19 (1968).]
"It is well settled that 'native-born' citizens, those born in the United States, qualify as natural born." [Jill Pryor, 'The Natural-Born Citizen Clause and Presidential Eligibility', 97 Yale Law Journal 881-889 (1988).]
Leo Donofrio has now found the definition in legal precedent.Have you noticed the results when Donofrio tests his legal theories in court?
Nice try. But you’re still full of crap.
Jill Pryor is a 100%, in-the-tank socialist and Democrat, so she would write propaganda screed, non of which is accurate. She wants to see the United States join in the socialist utopia known as Globalism.
WOW! No surprise there!
Pryor is just like Herlihy, another commie Democrat hell-bent on destroying the United States via Globalism (AMENDING THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN REQUIREMENT: GLOBALIZATION AS THE IMPETUS AND THE OBSTACLE - SARAH P. HERLIHY).
Pryor and Herlihy present arguments at odds with one another; one claims falsely it is all settled, while the other whines it must be changed. Obviously, overthrowing the United States from within causes schizophrenia in the Democratic.
You aren’t a Conservative, so I’m not surprised you read anti-American propaganda.
Doubtless there will be court challenges.
Doubtless SCOTUS will follow precedent set by other Supreme Courts before them, not some left-wing authors and certainly not by your opinions.
“There is a gun behind every blade of grass.” Overthrowing the U.S. isn’t going to be a cake-walk.