Replies

To: rxsid

Is anyone else wondering why it took so long for this precedent to surface?

I thought lawyers were more effective than taking 3 years to find a direct precedent.

What complaint/court filing has to happen to make sure this precedent is enforced?

11 posted on 06/21/2011 2:17:28 PM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)

To: Triple

This Precedent and a dollar might buy him a cup of coffee at the Wawa.

Now you see it now you don’t.

15 posted on 06/21/2011 2:35:26 PM PDT by Venturer

To: Triple

Is anyone else wondering why it took so long for this precedent to surface?

Minor v. Happerset is hardly fresh evidence. It's been discussed here many times.

43 posted on 06/21/2011 4:29:34 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)

To: Triple

“Is anyone else wondering why it took so long for this precedent to surface?”

Because it’s the usual Birther misunderstanding, mischaracterizing, misinterpreting and misrepresenting of law?

92 posted on 06/21/2011 8:46:58 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)

To: Triple

Is anyone else wondering why it took so long for this precedent to surface?

Because it's not a precedent. It's dicta. Dicta are not now, and never have been, legal precedent.

236 posted on 06/23/2011 2:49:43 AM PDT by Nathanael1

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794