Mitt Romney vs Sarah Palin(the media denies the rivalry despite the mounting evidence)

June 18, 2011 | techno

[IM2MAD]

I think it’s the crossover states that will enable the dems to vote for mittens in the primaries. They (the states) better wise up or it may be over.

[abb]

For every Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, and Rachel Maddow out there, there are several Stephen Bannons, Rush Limbaughs, Mark Levins and Andrew Breitbarts just chomping at the bit to play their uber-effective roles in setting straight the "Palin Truth" in a way that every Conservative and every Independent voter will have no choice but to acknowledge and give ultimate credence to.

And more important, imo, is the army of Tea Party types, independent conservative bloggers, and Facebook and Twitter networks that can in a flash neutralize the State-Run Media. We number in the millions and we are networked together via the greatest communications system yet known to man.

I have said it before, and I'll repeat, for the record: It is not "Game on, it's "Game over".

It isn't over, imo, but the strategy is set and we are in control. That's why the panic amongst the State-Run Media/Democrat/Beltway Insider/RINO axis.

[Texas Fossil]

Civil War is an oxymoron.

There is nothing ever “civil” about any war....

But if the Pubblie “leadership” thinks they can make us eat the crap sandwich made out of NittWitt Mitt, it is over. It will be the death of the Republican Party. I do not believe he has any chance to get the nomination, but if he does I am through.

I will never ever ever vote for NittWitt Mitt for anything. He is a total fraud, a Globalist Sellout and an Obozo meme.

NEVER! EVER!

[gotaz]

I agree. I am part of V4P and will volunteer time, money, whatever it takes to help Palin. The GOP establishment and LSM deliberately try to undermine her. We need to be prepared and organized. I am willing to help!

[grey_whiskers]

I think we ought to call Romney the Moon Pie candidate: tough-looking but crumbly on the outside, squishy marshmallow on the inside.

Just like Obama would be this:

(If anyone knows how to photoshop the Obama "O" onto that let me know.)

Cheers!

[9YearLurker]

I imagine you are well aware of how respectful Palin has been to both the Pauls, including endorsing Rand at a pivotal point, and that she regularly acknowledges the value in libertarianism and libertarians.

You sound like my type of Paul supporter: someone who likes to back Ron’s soapbox and message and impact on the presidential campaign (including the debates), but will act with seriousness of purpose if it comes down to the nitty gritty of Mitt getting the nomination if Palin isn’t supported.

[9YearLurker]

I’d say you’ve got it about pegged.

[Still Thinking]

The MSM must really believe that a good number of GOP primary voters are naive, gullible or simple-minded enough to believe such BS.

They may very well be right. In another thread, someone posted something to the effect of "What makes the MSM think they get to choose our nominee??!!" and the first thought that leaped into my head was "Uh, history?"

[meadsjn]

Should Sarah Palin run for office in 2012?

Votes: 8755

61% Yes, Sarah Palin should run for office in 2012.

37% No, Sarah Palin should not run for office in 2012.

1% I don't know. Please see my answer below.

[truthfreedom]

Well, I supported Paul in 2008, and I was one of the freepers who said “Nobody but Palin” for the VP pick in 2008.

I like the both of them. The preference for Paul is that I trust him to make cuts. It’s possible that Palin could focus on something else.