my post was somewhat tongue in cheek, but Jim had posted a most fervent reason why he would zot anyone towing the gay is ok line. Other posters pointed out the same thing in this thread (that the OP’s statement that he can’t condone Cain’s stance on homosexuality being a choice and a sin is really odd coming from a self proclaimed staunch conservative).
Those would be the main reasons why.
Here’s the link to Jim’s Post:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2725798/posts
I do not think that anything in this article can be defined as “Pro-gay.” He DID disagree with one opinion, but did not substitute a pro-gay one in it’s stead.