Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Sarah Palin must run in 2012
Big Government ^ | 6-14-11 | Tammy Bruce

Posted on 06/15/2011 10:00:51 AM PDT by radioone

One of the prevailing debates in the GOP these days (if not the only one) is whether or not Governor Sarah Palin will, or should, run for president. Not only should she, she must if the GOP has any hope of having a legitimate nominee whom everyone can support for the 2012 election.

Why? Without Palin in the race a massive segment of the GOP base—Tea Party patriots and other independent conservatives—will find themselves once again with the prospect of choosing from a manipulated field of Next-In-Line GOP establishment liberals.

And make no mistake—that is exactly who will prevail. Despite the desperate and not surprisingly shallow belief by the boys in control of the GOP, Palin cannot be replaced by another woman, or another Tea Party supporter, or another Brunette (no matter how much they think a Stalking Horse will split the Tea Party vote). Palin’s impact is unique, significant and deep. Her influence rests on background, experience, legitimacy and most important of all—trust. These are the reasons why Palin matters, the same reasons why the GOP machine appropriately sees her, and no one else, as an existential threat to their status quo.

Despite this, if the GOP truly wants to win 2012 (of which I’m not entirely convinced, after all, I hear Jeb Bush would love to beat Obama in 2016) they should be begging Palin to enter the race. Considering their portrayal of her, why not? Look, if you can’t beat Sarah Palin what makes you think you can beat Barack Obama? What are they so afraid of? Do they so not trust the decision-making of the American people they want to make sure you have no choice at all? Those lingering questions would eventually be answered—by an Obama victory on November 6, 2012.

Palin also has a dilemma. The decision to run is one only Palin can make, and she must know that choice is first and foremost a commitment to every voter so they can own the result of the election. No matter what happens, with so much at stake in the process, we must be able to look in the mirror and know the result is something of our doing, not a half-truth of the insecure and self-obsessed political class. This is the only way a large swath of the American populace will not abandon the process, allowing the government to maintain at least a semblance of legitimacy.

Palin must know the importance of her simply being in the arena. If she runs and is defeated for the nomination, the burden is then on the shoulders of the voters, they made the choice, not Palin, not the machine. With her in play, Reagan Republicans, conservative independents and Tea Party patriots will know their circumstances are of their doing, that the decision is truly theirs and will have no reason to resent the result or stay home on election day.

The contempt the GOP machine has for the average Republican voter is best illustrated by their other Big Fear—Palin does win the nomination! And why should we fear that? Well, that would be a disaster, because, uh, there’s no way she could win the general election and they have to stop that catastrophe from happening! You know, because Mr. Next-In-Line is for sure the only one who can beat Obama. Just like in 2008. Or something.

The truth of the matter is quite the opposite. They fear a Palin nomination because they know if she wins the GOP nod, she wins the general election. How? Consider these years of frantic and pathological attacks on Palin, all of which she has survived with the grace and dignity so void in her accusers. Now imagine what the establishment will try to do to her during the nominating process. If she wins the nomination despite what they do, it means she not only has convinced Republicans under extraordinary circumstances, she will have convinced the rest of the nation as well. If she wins the nomination with all that she will undoubtedly face during the Republican primaries, the presidency is hers.

All of America will watch to see if Republicans and conservatives are serious about saving this nation—that seriousness will be reflected in their nominee—if it’s Obama-lite—a mandate-supporting, universal healthcare-making, “the era of small government is over”-stating Big Government Conservative–why would anyone else feel compelled to abandon a cultural icon incumbent who represents those very same things?

For Sarah Palin, there is only one way for her “fundamental restoration of America” to take place—first, she must run.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: bruce; obama; palin; palin2010

1 posted on 06/15/2011 10:00:54 AM PDT by radioone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: radioone

2010 is over Tammy.


2 posted on 06/15/2011 10:01:39 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radioone

Headline fail.

GO SARAH!


3 posted on 06/15/2011 10:04:14 AM PDT by Freedom_Fighter_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radioone

It is now 2011


4 posted on 06/15/2011 10:04:26 AM PDT by frogjerk (Liberalism: The ideology of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radioone

Tammy is absolutely my favorite conservative lesbian talk show host!


5 posted on 06/15/2011 10:09:16 AM PDT by NavVet ("You Lie!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radioone
Why This Article Must Be Posted For A Third Time
6 posted on 06/15/2011 10:12:19 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radioone

I am a rabid Palin fan, but I don’t think she’ll run...


7 posted on 06/15/2011 10:29:01 AM PDT by FrankR (A people that values its privileges above its principles will soon lose both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radioone
Why Sarah Palin must run in 2010

On top of everything else, she has TIME TRAVEL?

8 posted on 06/15/2011 10:31:35 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radioone

Not Tammy’s fault on the headline. I’ll own up to that faux pas.


9 posted on 06/15/2011 10:33:28 AM PDT by radioone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radioone
Palin should join up with her buddy Trump and extort a Palin/Trump nomination from the repugnicans with threats of running as a third party. That should unite the anti-Obama votes. Palin could then quit and Trump as POTUS can bring on Armageddon with a war with Red China. Since Sarah can do no wrong, everybody wins.
10 posted on 06/15/2011 10:37:06 AM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kbennkc

Please tell me what you’re smoking so I know to avoid it.


11 posted on 06/15/2011 10:46:18 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kbennkc

The only thing I got out of your rambling little smear of a post is that YOU are the repugnant one.


12 posted on 06/15/2011 10:48:22 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

You linked to the 3 different postings, but you didn’t answer the question.

Why?

:)


13 posted on 06/15/2011 10:50:13 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: radioone

Why Sarah should run.
14 posted on 06/15/2011 11:08:05 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radioone

We can’t afford a mediocre or only “OK” president who pays lip service to reducing government, but who only ever increased the size of government. We can’t afford a Mitt Romney or Jon Huntsman.

We don’t have time for a so-so or average president who is a creature of DC and will likely get lost in the minutiae of legislation, or worse, begins to settle for good media. We don’t have time for a Pawlenty, Perry, or Gingrich.

We can’t risk an executive or political novice who might not have the executive skills to achieve what they claim are their goals. We can’t risk Bachmann, Santorum, or Cain.

Only two governors under consideration ever reduced the size of government: Gary Johnson and Sarah Palin. Gary Johnson is too libertarian for America.

By contrast, we’ve now seen - through 24,199 pages of insider emails - Palin is genuine, she is the real deal.

Haley Barbour had it wrong. It was never a question about purity, the question has always been can we trust them to reduce the government and debt?

We can’t afford it, don’t have the time for it, and can’t accept the risk of getting anything less than somebody who 100%, for sure, can and will save the country: Sarah Palin.


15 posted on 06/15/2011 11:20:19 AM PDT by TexasGunRunner (Sarah Palin will defeat BHO, and will be one of the best presidents of our lifetime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radioone
No matter how many days in a row you re-post this article, neither Sarah nor Tammy is going to date you.

Try thinking with your head of a change.

16 posted on 06/15/2011 11:39:23 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving politicians more tax money is like giving addicts free drugs to cure their addiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radioone
Title redaction:

Why Sarah Palin must run in 2012 (because she has lesbian friends & she won't try to 'cure' them like those freaks, Michele Bachmann & her husband) by Tammy Bruce

17 posted on 06/15/2011 7:08:33 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson